Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 17, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 18, 2026 - Jun 13, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Wearable Eye-Tracking Metrics From Smart Glasses for Cognitive Assessment: A Prospective Digital Health Study

  • Beau Bo-Sheng Chuang; 
  • Tzu-Wei Tseng; 
  • Po-Wei Sung; 
  • Hsiao-Chin Shen; 
  • Wan-Ting Chu; 
  • Chih-Hsun Wu; 
  • Yu-Wei Lee; 
  • Yan-Ru Chen; 
  • Hsiao-Yun Yeh; 
  • Hsin-Yi Hsu; 
  • Ying-Ying Yang; 
  • De-Kuang Hwang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Reading performance is closely associated with cognitive function, and eye-tracking metrics have emerged as sensitive, non-invasive indicators of cognitive processes. Recent advances in wearable technologies, such as smart glasses, enable continuous and scalable measurement of eye movements in real-world settings. However, rapid, accessible, and objective tools for cognitive screening remain limited. Integrating wearable eye-tracking with multidomain cognitive assessment may provide a scalable digital approach for early detection of cognitive impairment.

Objective:

To evaluate the association between wearable eye-tracking metrics and cognitive performance and to assess the feasibility of a smart glasses–based reading task as a rapid digital screening tool.

Methods:

In this prospective observational study, Mandarin-literate adults were recruited from Taipei Veterans General Hospital between May to August 2025. Participants completed a standardized reading task while wearing J7EF Gaze smart glasses. Eight eye-tracking metrics were recorded, followed by the six-domain cognitive assessment using gaze-based interaction. Associations were analyzed via multivariable regression adjusted for age and sex.

Results:

A total of 134 participants were enrolled (mean age 68.2 ± 13.4 years). Age correlated with all six cognitive domains and the total score, while sex exhibited smaller, domain-specific effects. In unadjusted analyses, total reading time showed the strongest associations with all cognitive domains (p < 0.001), while fixation duration, fixation frequency, and long or ultra-long fixations showed selective associations with orientation. After adjusting for age and sex, total reading time, total fixation time and average fixation time remained significant predictors.

Conclusions:

Total reading time emerged as a robust, age-independent eye-tracking marker of cognitive performance. Fixation-related metrics showed domain-specific associations, particularly with the puzzle game hobbies domain of the cognitive assessment. Wearable smart glasses with integrated eye tracking may provide a rapid, non-invasive, and scalable approach for digital cognitive screening in clinical and real-world settings.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chuang BBS, Tseng TW, Sung PW, Shen HC, Chu WT, Wu CH, Lee YW, Chen YR, Yeh HY, Hsu HY, Yang YY, Hwang DK

Wearable Eye-Tracking Metrics From Smart Glasses for Cognitive Assessment: A Prospective Digital Health Study

JMIR Preprints. 17/04/2026:98654

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.98654

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/98654

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.