Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 9, 2025
Date Accepted: Mar 9, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Digital Technologies and Biomarkers for Locomotor Capacity Assessment in Older Adults: Systematic Review

Zhou S, Huang J, Yu J, Li X, Zhang C, Zhao Y, Hu M, Feng H

Digital Technologies and Biomarkers for Locomotor Capacity Assessment in Older Adults: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e83814

DOI: 10.2196/83814

PMID: 41980180

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Digital technologies and biomarkers for locomotor capacity assessment in older adults: a systematic review

  • Shuhan Zhou; 
  • Jundan Huang; 
  • Jia Yu; 
  • Xiaoyang Li; 
  • Chi Zhang; 
  • Yinan Zhao; 
  • Mingyue Hu; 
  • Hui Feng

ABSTRACT

Background:

Locomotor capacity, encompassed by endurance, balance, muscle strength, muscle function, muscle power, and joint function of the body, is a key determinant of functional ability in older adults. Digital technologies for objectively assessing locomotor capacity are increasingly developed.

Objective:

This systematic review aims to evaluate the current state of digital technologies, assessing their validity and reliability to establish a robust foundation for future technological advancements and facilitate their effective implementation in clinical and research settings.

Methods:

Systematic searches were conducted in six electronic databases from inception to Mar 7, 2025. Studies focusing on reliability and validity of digital technologies for assessing locomotor capacity in older adults were included. Standardized forms were utilized to extract data, and the methodological quality assessment and rating of measurement properties were conducted following the COSMIN guidelines.

Results:

A total of nine studies were included, of which eight assessed balance using inertial measurement units, smartphones, and force plates, and one assessed muscle power using smartphones. The methodological quality of measurement properties received inadequate or doubtful in seven studies. All included studies generally displayed sufficient test-retest reliability, criterion validity, convergent validity and discriminative validity, with only one study rated as insufficient quality for convergent validity.

Conclusions:

The included studies demonstrated the potential of technology in balance assessment; however, most were limited by small sample sizes and methodological shortcomings. High-quality studies are required to determine the diagnostic efficacy of these technologies and to ensure the development of rigorously validated, age-friendly assessment instruments. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO CRD420251074143; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251074143


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhou S, Huang J, Yu J, Li X, Zhang C, Zhao Y, Hu M, Feng H

Digital Technologies and Biomarkers for Locomotor Capacity Assessment in Older Adults: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e83814

DOI: 10.2196/83814

PMID: 41980180

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.