Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Aug 13, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 15, 2025 - Oct 10, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 13, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Perspectives on remote monitoring technology of South Asians living with a long-term condition in the United Kingdom: a qualitative study
ABSTRACT
Background:
South Asians face a higher burden of long-term conditions, while also experiencing more inequities in healthcare access and outcomes. Despite the potential of remote monitoring technologies to improve management of long-term conditions, South Asians are less likely to engage with digital health interventions and are underrepresented in health research, partly due to language barriers.
Objective:
This study explored the perspectives and needs regarding remote monitoring technologies of South Asians living with a long-term condition in the United Kingdom who did not have English as their first language. We used rheumatoid arthritis and early inflammatory arthritis as example long-term conditions.
Methods:
We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with Pakistani adults diagnosed with rheumatoid or early inflammatory arthritis and who did not have English as their first language. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim, de-identified, and analysed thematically.
Results:
Seventeen adults participated in this study; none of them had previous experience of remote monitoring technologies. We identified three themes: (a) perceived value and challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for disease (self-) management; (b) differences in perceived needs and capacity for using remote monitoring technologies between first and later-generation immigrants related to social determinants; and (c) role of community and family support for using remote monitoring technologies. Participants perceived remote monitoring technologies as useful, in particular where they were dissatisfied with current healthcare services. Language and family and community members’ role in supporting technology use were considered important factors, but needs in these areas varied between first and second/third generation immigrants. In particular for first-generation immigrants, these factors intersected with other social and digital determinants, such as gender and literacy, resulting in additional requirements.
Conclusions:
Addressing language and literacy barriers, alongside leveraging family and community support, will contribute to equitable remote monitoring technologies to facilitate (self-) managing long-term conditions among South Asian ethnic minority groups. Future efforts should focus on developing tailored, culturally responsive approaches, particularly for first-generation immigrants, to ensure remote monitoring technologies decrease rather than exacerbate existing ethnic health inequities. Clinical Trial: Not applicable
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.