Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Mar 27, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 27, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Physicians’ perspectives on Internet-informed patients: a systematic review
ABSTRACT
Background:
The internet has become a common source of health information for patients. However, online information is not always accurate and relevant to the patient's condition. Patients desire physicians’ expertise to help them interpret the internet information. As another party in this dyadic patient-physician relationship, physicians’ perspectives on patients’ online information-seeking behavior merit special attention. However, physicians’ perceptions and experiences are understudied in the literature, in contrast to the attention closely paid to the patient’s side.
Objective:
This review explores physicians’ perspectives regarding patients’ internet information-seeking behavior and their interactions with internet-informed patients (IIP).
Methods:
We identified 21 eligible articles by searching PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Communication and Mass Media Complete, and PsycINFO from January 1990 to August 2022. Thematic analysis was performed to analyze the data.
Results:
Physicians hold diverse views on patients' internet searches, which can be viewed as a continuous spectrum of opinions ranging from positive to negative. Two communicative strategies were identified: the participative and defensive approaches. The former aims to “join in” IIP with physicians’ expertise, while the latter wishes to block the patients from online information. Physicians’ perceptions are linked to their strategies: physicians holding positive views tend to adopt a participative approach, while negative physicians favor a defensive strategy. Some physicians claimed to shift between the two approaches depending on their interaction with a certain patient. We also identified several challenges and needs of physicians in dealing with IIP, including time pressure to address IIP demands, lack of structured training, and uncertainty about trustworthy online health information sources.
Conclusions:
This review highlights the varied perceptions among physicians regarding internet-informed patients and emphasises the links between their communication approaches and perceptions. By identifying the challenges that physicians face, we offer valuable insights for supporting physicians in managing IIP. Clinical Trial: Not applicable.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.