Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 27, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 27, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Physician Perspectives on Internet-Informed Patients: Systematic Review

Lu Q, Schulz PJ

Physician Perspectives on Internet-Informed Patients: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e47620

DOI: 10.2196/47620

PMID: 38842920

PMCID: 11190621

Physician perspectives on internet-informed patients: a systematic review

  • Qianfeng Lu; 
  • Peter Johannes Schulz

ABSTRACT

Background:

The internet has become a common source of health information for patients. However, online information is not always accurate and relevant to the patient's condition. Patients desire physicians’ expertise to help them interpret the internet information. As another party in this dyadic patient-physician relationship, physicians’ perspectives on patients’ online information-seeking behavior merit special attention. However, physicians’ perceptions and experiences are understudied in the literature, in contrast to the attention closely paid to the patient’s side.

Objective:

This review explores physicians’ perspectives regarding patients’ internet information-seeking behavior and their interactions with internet-informed patients (IIP).

Methods:

We identified 21 eligible articles by searching PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Communication and Mass Media Complete, and PsycINFO from January 1990 to August 2022. Thematic analysis was performed to analyze the data.

Results:

Physicians hold diverse views on patients' internet searches, which can be viewed as a continuous spectrum of opinions ranging from positive to negative. Two communicative strategies were identified: the participative and defensive approaches. The former aims to “join in” IIP with physicians’ expertise, while the latter wishes to block the patients from online information. Physicians’ perceptions are linked to their strategies: physicians holding positive views tend to adopt a participative approach, while negative physicians favor a defensive strategy. Some physicians claimed to shift between the two approaches depending on their interaction with a certain patient. We also identified several challenges and needs of physicians in dealing with IIP, including time pressure to address IIP demands, lack of structured training, and uncertainty about trustworthy online health information sources.

Conclusions:

This review highlights the varied perceptions among physicians regarding internet-informed patients and emphasises the links between their communication approaches and perceptions. By identifying the challenges that physicians face, we offer valuable insights for supporting physicians in managing IIP. Clinical Trial: Not applicable.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lu Q, Schulz PJ

Physician Perspectives on Internet-Informed Patients: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e47620

DOI: 10.2196/47620

PMID: 38842920

PMCID: 11190621

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.