Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 30, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 12, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Three-Day Monitoring of Adhesive Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Patch for Premature Ventricular Complex: Prospective Study for Diagnosis Validation and Evaluation of Burden Fluctuation

Ahn HJ, Choi EK, Kwon S, Lee SR, Song HS, Lee YS, Oh S

Three-Day Monitoring of Adhesive Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Patch for Premature Ventricular Complex: Prospective Study for Diagnosis Validation and Evaluation of Burden Fluctuation

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e46098

DOI: 10.2196/46098

PMID: 38512332

PMCID: 10995782

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Three-day monitoring of adhesive single-lead electrocardiogram patch for premature ventricular complex: validation of diagnostic yield and evaluation of burden fluctuation

  • Hyo-Jeong Ahn; 
  • Eue-Keun Choi; 
  • Soonil Kwon; 
  • So-Ryoung Lee; 
  • Hee-Seok Song; 
  • Young-Shin Lee; 
  • Seil Oh

ABSTRACT

Background:

Wearable monitoring devices of an electrocardiogram (ECG) are widely used. However, the date of an adhesive single-lead ECG patch (SEP) in the diagnosis and 24-hour burden assessment of premature ventricular complex (PVC) is limited.

Objective:

We validated the diagnostic yield of SEP (mobiCAREā„¢ MC-100, Seers Technology) for PVC detection and evaluated the variation of PVC burden monitored during three days.

Methods:

Patients with documented PVC on a 12-lead ECG were recruited. They underwent simultaneous ECG monitoring by the Holter and SEP on the first day. On the subsequent second and third days, ECG monitoring by SEP was continued and completed 3-day extended monitoring. We compared the detection yield of PVC on the first day of SEP to that of the Holter. Daily and 6-hour PVC burden variation was evaluated from the SEP data. The number of patients additionally identified to reach PVC thresholds of 10%, 15%, and 20% on 3-day extended monitoring of SEP and clinical factors associated with the higher burden variation were explored.

Results:

Recruited data of 134 monitored patients (mean age, 54.6 years; male, 33.6%) were analyzed. The median daily PVC burden was 2.4 (0.2-10.9) % by the Holter and 3.3 (0.3-11.7) % for the 3-day monitoring of SEP. The daily PVC burden detected on the first day of SEP was in agreement with that of the Holter: the mean difference was -0.07%, with 95% limits of agreement (-1.44%, 1.30%). A higher PVC burden on the first day was correlated with a higher daily (R2=0.34) and 6-hour burden variation (R2=0.48). Three-day monitoring by SEP identified 12/42 (28.6%), 10/56 (17.9%), and 4/60 (6.7%) more patients reaching 10%, 15%, and 20% of daily PVC burden, respectively. Younger age was associated with an additional detection of PVC burden with clinical significance on the extended monitoring (P=.02).

Conclusions:

A SEP accurately detects PVC with a comparable diagnostic yield to the Holter. Three-day monitoring of PVC using SEP could be a practical alternative to identify more patients who cross the significant burden threshold. Young patients might require extended monitoring to determine the optimal treatment strategy for PVC.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ahn HJ, Choi EK, Kwon S, Lee SR, Song HS, Lee YS, Oh S

Three-Day Monitoring of Adhesive Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Patch for Premature Ventricular Complex: Prospective Study for Diagnosis Validation and Evaluation of Burden Fluctuation

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e46098

DOI: 10.2196/46098

PMID: 38512332

PMCID: 10995782

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.