Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Jul 1, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 1, 2022 - Aug 26, 2022
Date Accepted: Apr 3, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Patient preferences for electronic communication modes: How to deliver health information to patients beyond clinical encounters?
ABSTRACT
Background:
Health information delivered to people via their daily modes of communication such as email, text, or telephone has been shown to support adherence to recommended screening tests, treatments, clinical appointments, and vaccinations. While different communication modes have proven successful for outcomes, patients’ perceptions of such communication modes are not well studied.
Objective:
We addressed this gap by assessing primary care patient preferences for receiving health information from their doctor’s office. We explored stated preferences by communication modes, health topics, and patient socio-demographic characteristics to gauge acceptability for future interventions.
Methods:
We used a mailed survey to recruit adult primary care patients aged 45-75 years in 2020. The survey assessed respondents' use of telephones, computers, or tablets in daily life and their preferred modes of communication for different types of health information, including educational materials about cancer screening, tips for taking prescription medication, and protection from respiratory diseases from their doctor’s office. Respondents were asked to indicate their willingness to receive messages from their doctor’s office via each of the provided modes of communication, including telephone, text, email, online patient portal, and social media using a 5-point Likert response scale with the range from unwilling to willing. We report the percent of respondents indicating their “willingness” to receive information by mode. Chi-square tests were used to compare willingness by person-level characteristics.
Results:
In total, 133 people completed the survey with a response rate of 27%. The average age of respondents was 64 years; 63% of respondents were female; 83% White, 16% African American, 1% Asian; in total, 58% reported having a bachelor’s degree or higher; 20% resided in rural areas, 29% in suburban areas, 39% in a town, and 12% in a city. The majority, 91%, of respondents reported being comfortable with their income. Preferences for cancer screening information were distributed as follows: 75% of respondents were willing to receive information from their doctor’s office via their patient portal, 74% via email, 56% via text, 45% via the hospital website, 38% via telephone, and 11% via social media. About 5% of respondents were unwilling to receive communication by any mode. Preferences of respondents varied by age, gender, education, and race. Respondents’ preferences were distributed similarly for health information related to prescription medications and protection from respiratory diseases.
Conclusions:
To optimize health communication and reach a socio-diverse population it is important to use a multi-mode approach when distributing health messages. Clinical Trial: NA
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.