JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

Background:

Health information delivered via daily modes of communication such as email, text, or telephone has been shown to support improved health behavior and outcomes. While different modes of communication beyond clinical visits have proven successful for patient outcomes, preferences for communication modes have not been comprehensively studied among older primary care patients. We addressed this gap by assessing patient preferences for receiving cancer screening and other information from their doctor’s office.

Objective:

We explored stated preferences by communication modes through the lens of social determinants of health (SDOH) to gauge acceptability and equity implications for future interventions.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey was mailed to primary care patients aged 45-75 years, in 2020-21. The survey assessed respondents' use of telephones, computers, or tablets in daily life and their preferred modes of communication for different types of health information, including educational materials about cancer screening, tips for taking prescription medication, and protection from respiratory diseases from their doctor’s office. Respondents indicated their willingness to receive messages from their doctor’s office via each of the provided modes of communication, including telephone, text, email, online patient portal, website, and social media. They reported on a 5-point Likert scale that ranged from “unwilling” to “willing.” We present the percentage of respondents who indicated that they were “willing” to receive information via specific electronic mode. Chi-square tests were used to compare participants’ willingness by social characteristics.

Results:

In total, 133 people completed the survey with a response rate of 27%. The average age of respondents was 64 years; 63% of respondents were female; 83% were White, 16% were Black, and 1% were Asian. In total, 58% reported having a bachelor’s degree or higher; 20% resided in rural areas, 29% in suburban areas, 39% in a town, and 12% in a city. The majority, 73%, reported being comfortable with their income. Preferences of respondents for electronic communication about cancer screening were distributed as follows: 75% of respondents were willing to receive information from their doctor’s office via their patient portal, 74% via email, 56% via text, 45% via the hospital website, 38% via telephone, and 11% via social media. About 5% of respondents were unwilling to receive any communication by electronic mode. Preferences were distributed similarly for other types of information. Respondents reporting less income and less education consistently preferred receiving telephone calls relative to other communication modes.

Conclusions:

To optimize health communication and reach a socioeconomically diverse population, telephone calls should be added to electronic communication, especially for people with less income and education. Further research needs to identify the underlying reasons for the observed differences and how best to ensure that socioeconomically diverse groups of older adults can access reliable health information and healthcare services. Clinical Trial: NA