Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 22, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 16, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Workarounds in Electronic Health Record Systems and the Revised Sociotechnical Electronic Health Record Workaround Analysis Framework: Scoping Review

Blijleven V, Hoxha F, Jaspers M

Workarounds in Electronic Health Record Systems and the Revised Sociotechnical Electronic Health Record Workaround Analysis Framework: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(3):e33046

DOI: 10.2196/33046

PMID: 35289752

PMCID: 8965666

Workarounds in Electronic Health Record Systems: A Scoping Review and Revised SEWA Framework

  • Vincent Blijleven; 
  • Florian Hoxha; 
  • Monique Jaspers

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic health record system (EHR) users devise workarounds to cope with mismatches between workflows designed in the EHR and preferred workflows in practice. Although workarounds appear beneficial at first sight, they frequently jeopardize patient safety, quality of care, and efficiency of care.

Objective:

To aid in identifying, analyzing, and resolving EHR workarounds, a sociotechnical EHR workaround analysis framework (SEWA) was published in 2019. Although the framework was based on a large case study, the framework still required theoretical validation, refinement, and enrichment.

Methods:

A scoping literature review was performed on studies related to EHR workarounds published between 2010-2021 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane or IEEE databases. 737 studies were retrieved, of which 62 were included in the final analysis. Using an analytic frame, the included studies were investigated to uncover rationales EHR users have for workarounds, attributes characterizing workarounds, possible scopes, and types of perceived impact of workarounds.

Results:

The SEWA framework was validated and refined based on the scoping review. Extensive support for the preexisting rationales, attributes, possible scopes, and types of impact was found in the included studies. Moreover, 7 new rationales, 4 new attributes, and 3 new types of impact were incorporated. Similarly, the descriptions of multiple preexisting rationales for workarounds were refined to describe each rationale more accurately.

Conclusions:

SEWA is now grounded in the existing body of peer-reviewed empirical evidence on EHR workarounds and as such provides a validated and more complete synthesis on EHR workaround rationales, attributes, possible scopes, and types of impact. Moreover, SEWA is likely now also applicable in settings other than academic hospitals. The revised SEWA framework can aid researchers and practitioners in a wider range of healthcare settings to identify, analyze, and resolve workarounds. This to improve user centered EHR (re)design, ultimately leading to improved patient safety, quality of care, and efficiency of care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Blijleven V, Hoxha F, Jaspers M

Workarounds in Electronic Health Record Systems and the Revised Sociotechnical Electronic Health Record Workaround Analysis Framework: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(3):e33046

DOI: 10.2196/33046

PMID: 35289752

PMCID: 8965666

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.