Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 24, 2020
Date Accepted: Nov 8, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing Physicians’ Recall Bias of Work Hours With a Mobile App: Interview and App-Recorded Data Comparison

Wang HH, Lin YH

Assessing Physicians’ Recall Bias of Work Hours With a Mobile App: Interview and App-Recorded Data Comparison

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(12):e26763

DOI: 10.2196/26763

PMID: 34951600

PMCID: 8742215

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Association between Excessive Work Hours and Recall Bias: Assessing Physicians’ Underestimation of Work Hours with a Mobile App

  • Hsiao-Han Wang; 
  • Yu-Hsuan Lin

ABSTRACT

Background:

Accurate documentation of work hours is fundamental for the formation of labor policies. Previous studies have shown inconsistencies in the accuracy of self-reported work hours.

Objective:

This study aims to estimate physicians’ recall bias of work hours with a mobile app, and to examine the association between the recall bias and physicians’ work hours.

Methods:

We quantified recall bias by calculating the differences between the app-recorded and self-reported work hours of the previous week and the penultimate week. We recruited 18 physicians to install the “Staff Hours” app, which automatically recorded GPS-defined work hours for 2 months, contributing 1068 person-days. We examined the association between work hours and two recall bias indicators: (1) the difference between self-reported and app-recorded work hours (D), and (2) the percentage of days for which work hours were not precisely recalled during interviews (NR).

Results:

App-recorded work hours correlated highly with self-reported counterparts (r = 0.86–0.88, P<.001). Self-reported work hours were significantly lower than app-records consistently, by -8.97 ± 8.60 hours (D1) and -6.48 ± 8.29 (D2) hours for the previous week and the penultimate week, respectively (P<.001). The recall bias indicator D1 was significantly correlated with work hours in the previous week (r = -0.410, P = .013), but the correlation with the penultimate week was not significant (r = -0.119, P = .476). NR2 (38.6%) was significantly higher than NR1 (16.0%), and NR2 was significantly correlated with work hours of the penultimate week (r = 0.489, P = .002)

Conclusions:

Our study identified the existence of recall bias of work hours, the extent to which the recall was biased, and the influence of work hours on recall bias.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang HH, Lin YH

Assessing Physicians’ Recall Bias of Work Hours With a Mobile App: Interview and App-Recorded Data Comparison

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(12):e26763

DOI: 10.2196/26763

PMID: 34951600

PMCID: 8742215

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.