Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Dec 24, 2020
Date Accepted: Nov 8, 2021
Association between Excessive Work Hours and Recall Bias: Assessing Physicians’ Underestimation of Work Hours with a Mobile App
ABSTRACT
Background:
Accurate documentation of work hours is fundamental for the formation of labor policies. Previous studies have shown inconsistencies in the accuracy of self-reported work hours.
Objective:
This study aims to estimate physicians’ recall bias of work hours with a mobile app, and to examine the association between the recall bias and physicians’ work hours.
Methods:
We quantified recall bias by calculating the differences between the app-recorded and self-reported work hours of the previous week and the penultimate week. We recruited 18 physicians to install the “Staff Hours” app, which automatically recorded GPS-defined work hours for 2 months, contributing 1068 person-days. We examined the association between work hours and two recall bias indicators: (1) the difference between self-reported and app-recorded work hours (D), and (2) the percentage of days for which work hours were not precisely recalled during interviews (NR).
Results:
App-recorded work hours correlated highly with self-reported counterparts (r = 0.86–0.88, P<.001). Self-reported work hours were significantly lower than app-records consistently, by -8.97 ± 8.60 hours (D1) and -6.48 ± 8.29 (D2) hours for the previous week and the penultimate week, respectively (P<.001). The recall bias indicator D1 was significantly correlated with work hours in the previous week (r = -0.410, P = .013), but the correlation with the penultimate week was not significant (r = -0.119, P = .476). NR2 (38.6%) was significantly higher than NR1 (16.0%), and NR2 was significantly correlated with work hours of the penultimate week (r = 0.489, P = .002)
Conclusions:
Our study identified the existence of recall bias of work hours, the extent to which the recall was biased, and the influence of work hours on recall bias.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.