Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Dec 8, 2020
Date Accepted: May 11, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A study to investigate the prevalence of device specific errors in inhaler technique in adults with airway disease (The SCORES Study): Protocol for a prevalence study
ABSTRACT
Background:
It is a recurring theme in clinical practice that patients using inhaled medications via an inhaler do not use their device to a standard that allows for optimum therapeutic effect; with some studies showing that up to 90% of people do not use their inhalers properly. Observation and correction of inhaler technique by healthcare professionals is advised in both national and international guidelines and should be performed at every opportunity to ensure that the optimum inhaler technique is being achieved by the user. This study will deliver greater understanding of which technique errors are made most frequently by people using 13 different inhaler types.
Objective:
This study aims to identify and compare inhaler technique errors and their prevalence in adults, using device-specific checklists using manufacturers’ guidelines, for 13 specific inhaler types across all lung conditions and to correlate these errors with possible determinants of poor technique. It also aims to assess the error frequency at each step in the device-specific questionnaires and compare error rates between device types.
Methods:
In a single visit, participants using an inhaler included in the inclusion criteria will have their inhaler technique observed, recorded using device-specific checklists and then optimised.
Results:
The study is already underway, and it is anticipated that the results will be available by 2021.
Conclusions:
The SCORES Study will ascertain the prevalence of device-specific inhaler technique errors at each step in the device-specific checklists, compare error rates between 13 device types and correlate these errors with possible determinants of poor technique. Future work will involve the clarification and classification of these errors into ‘critical’ and ‘non-critical’ categories. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04262271 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04262271?term=NCT04262271&draw=2&rank=1
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.