Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
De Vos R, Brown T, Longstaff J, Lomax M, Mackenzie H, Hicks A, Rupani H, Gates J, Fox L, Wiffen L, Chauhan AJ
A Study to Investigate the Prevalence of Device-Specific Errors in Inhaler Technique in Adults With Airway Disease (The SCORES Study): Protocol for a Single Visit Prevalence Study
A study to investigate the prevalence of device specific errors in inhaler technique in adults with airway disease (The SCORES Study): Protocol for a single visit prevalence study
Ruth De Vos;
Thomas Brown;
Jayne Longstaff;
Mitch Lomax;
Heather Mackenzie;
Alexander Hicks;
Hitasha Rupani;
Jessica Gates;
Lauren Fox;
Laura Wiffen;
Anoop J Chauhan
ABSTRACT
Background:
It is a recurring theme in clinical practice that patients using inhaled medications via an inhaler do not use their device to a standard that allows for optimum therapeutic effect; with some studies showing that up to 90% of people do not use their inhalers properly. Observation and correction of inhaler technique by healthcare professionals is advised in both national and international guidelines and should be performed at every opportunity to ensure that the optimum inhaler technique is being achieved by the user. This study will deliver greater understanding of which technique errors are made most frequently by people using 13 different inhaler types.
Objective:
This study aims to identify and compare inhaler technique errors and their prevalence in adults, using device-specific checklists using manufacturers’ guidelines, for 13 specific inhaler types across all lung conditions and to correlate these errors with possible determinants of poor technique. It also aims to assess the error frequency at each step in the device-specific questionnaires and compare error rates between device types.
Methods:
In a single visit, participants using an inhaler included in the inclusion criteria will have their inhaler technique observed, recorded using device-specific checklists and then optimised.
Results:
The study is already underway, and it is anticipated that the results will be available by 2021.
Conclusions:
The SCORES Study will ascertain the prevalence of device-specific inhaler technique errors at each step in the device-specific checklists, compare error rates between 13 device types and correlate these errors with possible determinants of poor technique. Future work will involve the clarification and classification of these errors into ‘critical’ and ‘non-critical’ categories. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04262271
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04262271?term=NCT04262271&draw=2&rank=1
Citation
Please cite as:
De Vos R, Brown T, Longstaff J, Lomax M, Mackenzie H, Hicks A, Rupani H, Gates J, Fox L, Wiffen L, Chauhan AJ
A Study to Investigate the Prevalence of Device-Specific Errors in Inhaler Technique in Adults With Airway Disease (The SCORES Study): Protocol for a Single Visit Prevalence Study