Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 25, 2020
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 25, 2020 - Jan 25, 2021
Date Accepted: May 17, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Objective Outcomes Evaluation of Innovative Digital Health Curricula. Comment on “Undergraduate Medical Competencies in Digital Health and Curricular Module Development: Mixed Methods Study”

Grzeska A

Objective Outcomes Evaluation of Innovative Digital Health Curricula. Comment on “Undergraduate Medical Competencies in Digital Health and Curricular Module Development: Mixed Methods Study”

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(5):e26034

DOI: 10.2196/26034

PMID: 34047706

PMCID: 8196348

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Letter to the editor - Undergraduate Medical Competencies in Digital Health and Curricular ModuleDevelopment: Mixed Method Study

  • Alexander Grzeska

ABSTRACT

To the Editor: We read with great interest the study by Back et al. on the development of a curricular module for digital health and undergraduate medical competencies[1]. The paper illuminates the importance of implementing digital health training for future physicians in the curricula of medical universities[1]. While the paper discusses the benefits of building a critical and experience-based mindset of future physicians, we believe that measuring performance and skills acquired by the students before and after participation may augment development and implementation of digital health competencies in the medical curricula. A survey found high levels of satisfaction among students participating in the elective module. Confidence levels as well as acquisition of knowledge and skills in digital health were reported to be high. However, this analysis is subjective as it is based on the student’s own opinion of their knowledge. In order to obtain more objective results, we recommend the assessment of individual skills by a standardized exam before and after participating in the module. Supplementing the opinion-based survey with exam performance may shed light on the actual perceived level of student-competence while reducing selection bias. This would highlight the effectiveness of the course and give medical departments and universities more confidence to adopt digital health competencies in their curricula. We commend Back et al. not only for their findings but for how they encourage a more interactive and non-classical way of teaching[1]. We hope that the high satisfaction among students may encourage medical university to adopts this new model of teaching. Passive transfer of knowledge has been the dominating system used at medial universities[2] whereas active learning methods such as a “peer-to-peer”[1] teaching approach with an open discussion is rarely found, thus, resulting in high levels of satisfaction[3]. Therefore, we hope that this paper may persuade medical universities to adopt this new teaching approach. The introduction of digital health competencies into the medical curricula remains key to the success of future physicians as shown by Back et al. Therefore, we advocate for more objective student evaluation methods—before and after participating in learning modules—so that traditional medical institutions are convinced to adopt this new teaching approach.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Grzeska A

Objective Outcomes Evaluation of Innovative Digital Health Curricula. Comment on “Undergraduate Medical Competencies in Digital Health and Curricular Module Development: Mixed Methods Study”

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(5):e26034

DOI: 10.2196/26034

PMID: 34047706

PMCID: 8196348

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.