Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 10, 2020
Date Accepted: Aug 10, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Facilitators of and Barriers to Lifestyle Support and eHealth Solutions: Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals Working in Cardiac Care

Cohen Rodrigues TR, de Buisonjé DR, Keesman M, Reijnders T, van der Geer JE, Janssen VR, Kraaijenhagen RA, Atsma DE, Evers AWM

Facilitators of and Barriers to Lifestyle Support and eHealth Solutions: Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals Working in Cardiac Care

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(10):e25646

DOI: 10.2196/25646

PMID: 34652280

PMCID: 8556639

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Facilitators and Barriers in Lifestyle Support and eHealth Solutions: Interviews With Healthcare Professionals Working in Cardiac Care

  • Talia R Cohen Rodrigues; 
  • David R de Buisonjé; 
  • Mike Keesman; 
  • Thomas Reijnders; 
  • Jessica E van der Geer; 
  • Veronica R Janssen; 
  • Roderik A Kraaijenhagen; 
  • Douwe E Atsma; 
  • Andrea W M Evers

ABSTRACT

Background:

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) pose a significant health threat, and reduce both people’s life expectancy and quality of life. Healthy living is a key component in the effective prevention and treatment of CVD. However, healthcare professionals experience difficulties in supporting lifestyle change among their patients. eHealth could provide a solution to these barriers.

Objective:

This study aimed to provide insight into (1) what factors healthcare professionals find important in the support of CVD patients in the uptake of and adherence to a healthy lifestyle, and (2) the perceived facilitators and barriers of using eHealth to provide lifestyle support to CVD patients.

Methods:

In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 Dutch healthcare professionals who are specialized in lifestyle support in cardiac care.

Results:

We identified 13 themes, of which the first 12 concern lifestyle support in general, and were either intervention, patient-, or healthcare-related. Throughout these themes the use of eHealth reoccurred as a (potential) facilitator or solution to barriers in lifestyle support. Our final theme specifically concerned barriers in the adoption and usability of eHealth.

Conclusions:

Healthcare professionals do recognize the potential advantages of eHealth, but at the same time experience barriers in using digital tools. Incorporating their needs and values in the development of lifestyle support programs, and especially eHealth, could increase the use and lead to a more widespread adoption of eHealth into healthcare.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Cohen Rodrigues TR, de Buisonjé DR, Keesman M, Reijnders T, van der Geer JE, Janssen VR, Kraaijenhagen RA, Atsma DE, Evers AWM

Facilitators of and Barriers to Lifestyle Support and eHealth Solutions: Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals Working in Cardiac Care

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(10):e25646

DOI: 10.2196/25646

PMID: 34652280

PMCID: 8556639

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.