Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Mar 19, 2020
Date Accepted: Sep 15, 2020
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Application of In-Home Monitoring Data to Transition Decisions in CCRC's: A Randomized Controlled Trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Continuous in-home monitoring of older adults can provide rich and sensitive data capturing subtle behavioral and cognitive changes. Our previous work has identified multiple metrics that describe meaningful trends in daily activities over time. The continuous, multi-domain nature of this technology may also serve to inform caregivers of the need for increased attention in order to maintain the health and safety of at-risk older adults. Accordingly, care decisions can be based on objective, systematically assessed real-time data.
Objective:
The present study deployed a suite of in-home monitoring technologies to detect changing levels of care needs in residents of independent living units in seven retirement communities.
Methods:
Continuous activity data were presented to staff involved in decisions regarding transitions in care. Comparisons were planned between outcomes for residents whose data were shared and those whose data were not made available to staff. Staff use of the data dashboard was also monitored over the course of the study.
Results:
Despite initial enthusiasm and an iterative process of refinement of measures and modes of data presentation based on staff input, actual inspection and therefore use of resident data was well below expectation. Survey data and in-depth interviews offered insight to the mismatch between intended and actual use.
Conclusions:
Most continuous in-home monitoring technology acceptance models focus on perceived usefulness and ease of use, and equate intent to use technology with actual use. Our experience suggests otherwise. We found multiple intervening variables exist between perceived usefulness, intent to use and actual use. Ethical, institutional, and social factors are considered in their role as determinants of use.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.