Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: May 30, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 3, 2019 - Jun 17, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 22, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Bridging the Gap in Community Care for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder: Protocol for Qualitative Inquiry Into Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on Service Gaps and Potential Solutions for Severe Emotion Dysregulation

Friesen L, Gaine G, Klaver E, Klingle K, Parmar D, Hrabok M, Kelland J, Surood S, Agyapong V

Bridging the Gap in Community Care for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder: Protocol for Qualitative Inquiry Into Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on Service Gaps and Potential Solutions for Severe Emotion Dysregulation

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(8):e14885

DOI: 10.2196/14885

PMID: 32815818

PMCID: 7471890

Bridging the Gap in Community Care for Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder: Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on Service Gaps and Potential Solutions for Severe Emotion Dysregulation

  • Laura Friesen; 
  • Graham Gaine; 
  • Ellen Klaver; 
  • Kirsten Klingle; 
  • Devashree Parmar; 
  • Marianne Hrabok; 
  • Jill Kelland; 
  • Shireen Surood; 
  • Vincent Agyapong

ABSTRACT

Background:

Individuals diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) are not well served by current healthcare systems. Barriers include ineffective service utilization, system constraints, comorbid diagnoses, stigma, and high risk of suicide. Patients with BPD tend to get “lost to the system” or become frequent users of emergency departments and crisis teams. To better support individuals with severe emotion dysregulation, it is necessary to gain better understandings of patient, caregiver, and clinician perspectives and experiences with the healthcare system.

Objective:

To explore patient, caregiver, and clinician perspectives on the current care pathways for those with severe emotion dysregulation within a large Canadian metropolitan city (Edmonton, Alberta).

Methods:

Using qualitative methodology, 3-6 patients with a diagnosis of BPD, 3 caregivers of individuals with BPD, and 3 clinicians of patients diagnosed with BPD will be invited to share their experiences of the healthcare system’s response to individuals with BPD.

Results:

We expect that the findings of the study will illuminate the perspectives of patients with BPD, their caregivers, and their clinicians. We expect to gain a better understanding of the perceived gaps in services and potential solutions. The findings of the study are expected to be available in 12 months.

Conclusions:

The findings of the study have the potential to inform training, practice, policy, and future research in this area. The aim of this exploratory research is to develop better understandings that can lead to helpful action with this population.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Friesen L, Gaine G, Klaver E, Klingle K, Parmar D, Hrabok M, Kelland J, Surood S, Agyapong V

Bridging the Gap in Community Care for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder: Protocol for Qualitative Inquiry Into Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on Service Gaps and Potential Solutions for Severe Emotion Dysregulation

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(8):e14885

DOI: 10.2196/14885

PMID: 32815818

PMCID: 7471890

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.