Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Mar 20, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 26, 2019 - May 21, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 19, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Oct 30, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Identification of Informed Consent in Patient Videos on Social Media: Prospective Study

O'Sullivan J, Tierney P, Mc Carrick C, O'Connor DB, Collins J, Franklin R

Identification of Informed Consent in Patient Videos on Social Media: Prospective Study

JMIR Med Educ 2020;6(2):e14081

DOI: 10.2196/14081

PMID: 33048058

PMCID: 7592068

Has the YouTube Generation Crossed The Line: A Prospective Study Evaluating the Identification of Informed Consent to post patient videos on social media

  • Jane O'Sullivan; 
  • Paul Tierney; 
  • Cathleen Mc Carrick; 
  • Donal B O'Connor; 
  • Jack Collins; 
  • Robert Franklin

ABSTRACT

Background:

the American Medical Association regulations state that any clinical image taken for public education forms part of the patients’ records. Hence a patient’s informed consent is required to collect, share and distribute his or her image. Patients must be informed of the intended use of the clinical image and the intended audience as part of the informed consent Objectives: to determine whether a random selection of videos containing footage of real patients on YouTube identify the presence of informed consent to post the video on social media Design: A prospective evaluation of the first 125 videos on YouTube, with the search criteria “central line insertion” by 2 separate researchers Setting: Video content on YouTube Participants: Posters of footage containing real patient procedures Interventions: All posters were contacted to clarify the status of consent to both film and disseminate the video on social media. A period of 2 months was provided to respond to initial contact. Furthermore, YouTube were contacted to clarify company policy Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was to determine if videos on YouTube were amended to include details of consent at 2 months post-contact. The secondary outcome was a response to the initial email at 2 months

Results:

143 videos were compiled. 41 videos contained footage of patient procedures. 41/41 videos were of indeterminate consent status. 23/41 contained identifiable patient footage. 3/41 posters responded to initial contact. 0/41 amended the video to document consent status. Response from YouTube is pending Conclusion: There are videos on social media, containing footage of patients undergoing medical procedures, without any verification of informed consent. While this study investigated a small sample of available videos, the problem appears more ubiquitous, and should be studied more extensively


 Citation

Please cite as:

O'Sullivan J, Tierney P, Mc Carrick C, O'Connor DB, Collins J, Franklin R

Identification of Informed Consent in Patient Videos on Social Media: Prospective Study

JMIR Med Educ 2020;6(2):e14081

DOI: 10.2196/14081

PMID: 33048058

PMCID: 7592068

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.