Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 20, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 25, 2018 - Nov 20, 2018
Date Accepted: Mar 29, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Participatory Disease Surveillance Systems: Ethical Framework

Geneviève LD, Martani A, Wangmo T, Paolotti D, Koppeschaar C, Kjelsø C, Guerrisi C, Hirsch M, Woolley-Meza O, Lukowicz P, Flahault A, Elger BS

Participatory Disease Surveillance Systems: Ethical Framework

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(5):e12273

DOI: 10.2196/12273

PMID: 31124466

PMCID: 6660191

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Participatory Disease Surveillance Systems: Ethical Framework

  • Lester Darryl Geneviève; 
  • Andrea Martani; 
  • Tenzin Wangmo; 
  • Daniela Paolotti; 
  • Carl Koppeschaar; 
  • Charlotte Kjelsø; 
  • Caroline Guerrisi; 
  • Marco Hirsch; 
  • Olivia Woolley-Meza; 
  • Paul Lukowicz; 
  • Antoine Flahault; 
  • Bernice Simone Elger

Advances in information technology are changing public health at an unprecedented rate. Participatory surveillance systems are contributing to public health by actively engaging digital (eg, Web-based) communities of volunteer citizens to report symptoms and other pertinent information on public health threats and also by empowering individuals to promptly respond to them. However, this digital model raises ethical issues on top of those inherent in traditional forms of public health surveillance. Research ethics are undergoing significant changes in the digital era where not only participants’ physical and psychological well-being but also the protection of their sensitive data have to be considered. In this paper, the digital platform of Influenzanet is used as a case study to illustrate those ethical challenges posed to participatory surveillance systems using digital platforms and mobile apps. These ethical challenges include the implementation of electronic consent, the protection of participants’ privacy, the promotion of justice, and the need for interdisciplinary capacity building of research ethics committees. On the basis of our analysis, we propose a framework to regulate and strengthen ethical approaches in the field of digital public health surveillance.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Geneviève LD, Martani A, Wangmo T, Paolotti D, Koppeschaar C, Kjelsø C, Guerrisi C, Hirsch M, Woolley-Meza O, Lukowicz P, Flahault A, Elger BS

Participatory Disease Surveillance Systems: Ethical Framework

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(5):e12273

DOI: 10.2196/12273

PMID: 31124466

PMCID: 6660191

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.