Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
An ethical framework for the regulation of participatory disease surveillance systems
Lester Darryl Geneviève;
Andrea Martani;
Tenzin Wangmo;
Daniela Paolotti;
Carl Koppeschaar;
Charlotte Kjelsø;
Caroline Guerrisi;
Marco Hirsch;
Olivia Woolley-Meza;
Paul Lukowicz;
Antoine Flahault;
Bernice Simone Elger
ABSTRACT
Advances made in information technology are changing public health at an unprecedented rate. Participatory surveillance systems are contributing to public health by actively engaging Web-based communities of volunteer citizens to report symptoms of public health threats and also by empowering individuals to promptly respond to them. However, such Web-based model raises its own set of ethical issues, on top of those inherent to more traditional forms of public health surveillance. Research ethics is undergoing significant changes in the digital era where it is not sufficient to consider only participants’ physical and psychological well-being, but also the protection of their sensitive data. In this paper, the Web-based platform of Influenzanet is used as a case study to illustrate those ethical challenges which participant-surveillance-systems involving the use of Web-based platforms and mobile apps have to deal with. These ethical challenges include the issues of electronic consent, the protection of participants’ privacy and the promotion of justice. Our analysis is followed by recommendations to strengthen ethical approaches in the field of Web-based public health surveillance, with a particular focus on the role of research ethics committees.
Citation
Please cite as:
Geneviève LD, Martani A, Wangmo T, Paolotti D, Koppeschaar C, Kjelsø C, Guerrisi C, Hirsch M, Woolley-Meza O, Lukowicz P, Flahault A, Elger BS