Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Jun 16, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 17, 2026 - Aug 12, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Characterizing Emergency Department-to-Community Mental Health Transition Workflows and Digital Tool Design Requirements for Mental Health Clinicians: Qualitative Formative Study Using Rapid Qualitative Methods
ABSTRACT
Background:
Emergency departments (EDs) are critical access points for people experiencing mental health crises yet transitions to community-based care often break down. Mental Health Clinicians (MHCs) support discharge planning and referral coordination, but this work occurs within fragmented information environments. Digital and artificial intelligence (AI)-supported tools may help, but little is known about what MHCs would trust and use in high-stakes transition workflows.
Objective:
This study aimed to characterize current ED-to-community mental health transition workflows from the perspective of MHCs and identify design requirements for future digital or AI-supported transition support tools.
Methods:
We conducted a qualitative formative study using rapid qualitative methods. MHCs with direct experience supporting ED or urgent mental health discharge planning across three large academic hospital settings in Toronto, Ontario, participated in individual semi-structured interviews over Zoom. The interview guide was informed by service blueprinting concepts and explored transition workflows, decision points, information needs, tools used, referral pain points, and perceptions of digital or AI-supported tools. Data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Structured summaries were organized into matrices, including a current-state service blueprint and technology-supported design opportunities.
Results:
phases: consult trigger, chart review, patient assessment, consideration of collaboration needs, resource search, referral or discharge, and post-discharge. Across interviews, transition planning involved substantial manual effort, reliance on informal clinician knowledge, diverse collaboration with other care providers, and limited visibility into post-discharge outcomes. Four recurring patterns were identified: relationship-driven and locally embedded transition work; fragmented, outdated, and under-trusted information systems; largely invisible post-discharge outcomes; and conditional, mechanism-dependent trust in digital tools. Six technology-supported opportunities were identified: a trusted resource directory, wait-time and availability visibility, referral tracking, shared psychosocial and social work notes, a human provider directory, and AI-assisted resource matching. Participants suggested that AI may be most useful for filtering verified information, surfacing source-linked options, or identifying missing transition information, rather than generating autonomous or unverifiable referral recommendations.
Conclusions:
MHCs play a unique role in helping patients move from ED mental health care to community-based support. Digital and AI-supported tools may help address transition gaps when they are designed to strengthen, rather than replace, the trusted coordination work performed by clinicians. Future tools should prioritize source transparency, human verification, shared transition documentation, direct provider contact, and referral tracking. Future research should build on these findings through co-design and evaluation with MHCs, patients, peer workers, community agencies, and other care partners. Clinical Trial: N/A
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.