Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Jun 13, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 15, 2026 - Aug 10, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Micro-Interventions and Design Features for a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention in Chronic Back Pain: Descriptive Interview Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Chronic back pain (CBP) is a prevalent condition with substantial individual and socioeconomic impact. Pain catastrophizing is a key psychological factor associated with pain persistence and poor outcomes. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) represent a promising digital approach by delivering context-sensitive, personalized support in daily life. To inform early intervention design, it is important to understand how patients and clinicians prioritize candidate intervention components and delivery features.
Objective:
This study aimed to identify areas of alignment and divergence between patients with chronic back pain and clinicians regarding the prioritization of candidate micro-interventions and key JITAI design features to inform the development of a stakeholder-informed digital intervention targeting pain catastrophizing.
Methods:
Candidate micro-interventions were identified through a targeted, non-systematic literature review. Fifteen patients with chronic back pain and fifteen clinicians with experience in pain treatment participated in structured in-person interviews. Participants prioritized and rated micro-interventions from three domains (psychotherapy-based strategies, relaxation techniques, and physiotherapy exercises) with respect to anticipated usefulness and feasibility. They also evaluated key JITAI design parameters, including symptom-trigger thresholds, assessment frequency, and motivational features. Data were summarized descriptively to compare response patterns between stakeholder groups.
Results:
Patients and clinicians showed distinct prioritization patterns. Patients favored practical, low-threshold micro-interventions such as walking and abdominal breathing, whereas clinicians more often prioritized structured techniques such as progressive muscle relaxation. Both groups consistently rated physiotherapy interventions, particularly yoga, as highly relevant. Differences were also observed for preferred symptom-trigger thresholds and assessment frequency, with patients favoring earlier intervention triggers and fewer daily surveys. Motivational features such as gamification, real-time feedback, and clear interface design were identified as important by both groups
Conclusions:
This descriptive study highlights areas of alignment and divergence between patient and clinician priorities relevant to the design of a JITAI for CBP. The findings provide structured, stakeholder-informed design inputs to guide subsequent optimization and experimental evaluation of JITAI components in future trials.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.