Currently submitted to: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Jun 4, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 5, 2026 - Jul 9, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Intersectionality in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Health Care: Scoping Review Protocol
ABSTRACT
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are being increasingly leveraged in health care settings, but risk reproducing systemic biases. Integration of intersectionality and equity-related concepts offers an analytical framework to guide more reflexive, equity-oriented AI and ML design and implementation, particularly when paired with a co-production philosophy that meaningfully includes community-based collaborators and end-knowledge users. However, there is limited synthesis on how intersectionality is conceptualized and operationalized in this context, and the extent to which interdisciplinary collaborators and patient partners are involved in such undertakings is unknown.
Objective:
To synthesize how intersectionality is conceptualized and operationalized, including frameworks, pedagogical tools, and methods, in AI and ML for health care as well as the extent to which such projects utilize participatory or co-production frameworks.
Methods:
The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the scoping review framework developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. With the assistance of a research librarian, the following databases will be searched for published articles with primary data: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Emcare Nursing, APA PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Ovid), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Ovid). Two independent reviewers will screen the title and abstracts of articles, followed by its full text review, for eligibility against a priori inclusion criteria. Inclusion/exclusion conflicts will be resolved through a consensus process. Data will be extracted from included studies, and will be summarized narratively, accompanied by tables and charts. Patient/family partners will be engaged throughout the review process to refine the scope of the review, interpret findings, and support knowledge translation efforts, ensuring outputs are equity-oriented and responsive to community priorities.
Results:
Preliminary searches yielded a total of 4191 records across six databases. The scoping review will be completed by October 2026.
Conclusions:
This scoping review will be the first to map how intersectionality is used in AI and ML research in health care, with a particular focus on how the term is conceptualized, operationalized, and utilized in the context of community participatory practice. Findings from the review will identify key gaps in literature and provide community-relevant recommendations on how to meaningfully integrate intersectionality into the development of AI and ML for health care.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.