Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: May 28, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: May 31, 2026 - Jul 26, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Evaluating a Web-Based Intervention for Digital Health Measurement: a Mixed-methods Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Despite its potential to address key challenges in primary health care, digital health measurement faces substantial implementation barriers for health care professionals. To address these barriers, professionals from 4 disciplines - physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, and general practitioner practice assistance – collaborated with researchers to develop an intervention. The intervention comprised a website supported by coaching on the job as a temporary implementation strategy during development.
Objective:
This study explored whether and how the intervention facilitates optimized use of digital health measurement in patient care to inform further intervention refinement.
Methods:
A mixed-methods formative process evaluation was conducted using a predominantly qualitative approach. 18 health care professionals tested the intervention in daily practice. Data collection was guided by the Medical Research Council framework, a predefined process evaluation plan, and the intervention’s initial program theory. Quantitative data (questionnaires, 7-point Global Perceived Effect measures, and monitoring lists) informed semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and directed content analysis.
Results:
The intervention was largely implemented as intended and improved digital health measurement in patient care by enhancing participants’ capability, opportunity, and motivation. Consistent with the initial program theory, these changes triggered implementation activity at the organizational level, strengthening implementation readiness through bottom-up change processes. Intervention strategies included collaborative learning, modelling and prompting action. These strategies operated through mechanisms such as experiential learning, in which professionals experienced the benefits and feasibility of digital health measurement, reinforcing motivation for its continued use. During intervention use, additional processes emerged, including champions facilitating organizational-level adoption of digital measurement by sharing knowledge and enthusiasm with colleagues. Coaching particularly supported initial intervention engagement by contextualizing generic information, stimulating interaction, and prompting action. Individual, organizational, instrumental, temporal, policy, and societal factors interacted with intervention components, strategies, and mechanisms to facilitate or constrain outcomes.
Conclusions:
Future refinement should strengthen key mechanisms and processes, integrate mechanisms previously supported by coaching, and develop scalable implementation strategies. As no single approach will fit all contexts, practices should tailor implementation to their local needs. The intervention’s generic framework and flexible use of core components support local adaptations.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.