Currently submitted to: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Date Submitted: May 13, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: May 31, 2026 - Jul 26, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Title: From sitting to standing: Feasibility, Biomechanics, and User Experience of a Robotic Rollator for Active Sit-to-Stand Assistance in Older Adults with Mobility Challenges
ABSTRACT
Background:
Background:
Robotic mobility aids with sit-to-stand (STS) support may help older adults reduce physical effort during a demanding, fall-prone daily task
Objective:
Objective:
This paper reports a preliminary evaluation of the “SkyWalker” robotic walker, which provides powered STS assistance via actuated lower handles. The two SkyWalker trajectories (Linear and S-shape) were selected to examine how assistance profile shape (simple/monotonic versus more complex) influences feasibility, biome- chanics, and user experience
Methods:
Methods:
Six older adult patients with mobility challenges were recruited from a clinical setting and completed a within-subject protocol comprising three conditions: SkyWalker assistance with a Linear trajectory, SkyWalker assistance with an S-shape trajectory, and a conventional rollator. We quantified STS task performance, perceived exertion (Borg CR10), instrumented kinematics (center-of-gravity, CoG, height), kinet- ics (vertical ground-reaction force Fz normalized to body weight), and post-task tech- nology acceptance using the Tele-healthcare Satisfaction Questionnaire—Wearable Technology (TSQ-WT)
Results:
Results:
Across participants, robotic assistance tended to reduce perceived exertion relative to the rollator, with Linear generally appearing more robust and repeatable than S-shape. Biomechanical measures provided mechanistic context: Linear assis- tance was associated with earlier, more monotonic CoG elevation and more consistent load transfer across repetitions, whereas the S-shape trajectory showed greater be- tween participant variability in load-transfer timing and force profiles for some users, consistent with higher coordination demands. Acceptance was generally favorable but heterogeneous across individuals.
Conclusions:
Conclusions:
Overall, SkyWalker STS assistance was feasible and reduced perceived physical effort for most participants; the findings highlight trajectory design as a key determinant of user response and motivate trajectory personalization and brief familiarization, particularly for users who experience coordination challenges with more complex assistance profiles.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.