Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Apr 30, 2026

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

User Requirements for a Clinical Interface to Support Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using Wearable Inertial Sensors: An Iterative Design Study

  • Riasat Islam; 
  • Simon Holland; 
  • Blaine Price; 
  • Paul Mulholland

ABSTRACT

Background:

Wearable inertial sensors offer a promising approach for objective movement analysis in rehabilitation. However, despite advances in sensing accuracy, adoption in clinical practice remains limited. One barrier is the lack of clinician-facing software interfaces that translate sensor data into clinically interpretable information aligned with rehabilitation workflows.

Objective:

We aimed to identify clinician-centred user requirements and interface design considerations for wearable inertial sensor systems supporting lower-limb rehabilitation.

Methods:

We conducted an iterative user-centred design study with three clinicians involved in rehabilitation: a neuro-physiotherapist, a musculoskeletal physiotherapist, and an orthopaedic surgeon. The study consisted of (1) semi-structured interviews to elicit clinical requirements, (2) think-aloud evaluation of an initial wireframe interface mockup, and (3) evaluation of a revised mockup informed by earlier feedback. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis to identify clinician requirements and interface design considerations.

Results:

We identified four clinician-centred requirement themes spanning clinically meaningful movement metrics beyond standard functional tests, pragmatic sensor setup and calibration, interpretable longitudinal visualisation, and workflow-aligned reporting and task support. Across these requirement areas, clinicians consistently indicated that interpretability, setup burden, and workflow fit would influence whether such a system would be practical and acceptable in routine use.

Conclusions:

Through iterative engagement with clinicians, this study identifies rehabilitation-specific interface requirements for wearable inertial sensor systems in lower-limb rehabilitation. These findings articulate how successful translation into practice depends on concrete design features such as guided sensor placement, calibration options suited to patients with limited mobility, interpretable longitudinal visualisation, and reporting features that fit routine clinical work. Together, they provide early-stage design guidance on how clinician-facing rehabilitation interfaces should structure setup, calibration, visualisation, and reporting when presenting wearable-derived movement data.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Islam R, Holland S, Price B, Mulholland P

User Requirements for a Clinical Interface to Support Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using Wearable Inertial Sensors: An Iterative Design Study

JMIR Preprints. 30/04/2026:99862

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.99862

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/99862

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.