Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Apr 28, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 30, 2026 - Jun 25, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Enhancing Cardiac Surgeons’ Ergonomics: Minimizing Neck Movement During Surgery Using Micro-Monitors
ABSTRACT
Background:
During cardiovascular surgery, surgeons frequently extend their necks to view monitors. This frequent and repetitive motion can lead to cervical spine discomfort, fatigue or injury.
Objective:
We designed a study first to examine the significance of cervical ergonomics and then proposed a practical solution to address it effectively.
Methods:
Five different techniques were tested for accurately and specifically counting the number of neck extensions during surgery. the parameters above. The light sensor technique proved to be ideal method and was chosen for this purpose in 10 different surgical cases. Next, a device was designed to minimize the need for neck extensions by projecting the image of the monitor to a micro-monitor mounted on the surgical loupes that mirror the hemodynamic data monitor directly in front of surgeon’s eye.
Results:
During routine heart surgery, a surgeon extended the neck to look at the monitor in a range of 7-19 times in a coronary surgery and 12-47 times in a valve surgery in our series. Duration of the extensions are often as short as 2-3 seconds, during which the monitor data is read and then the neck is flexed to lo look back at the field.
Conclusions:
During heart surgery, especially valve surgery, the number of neck extensions can reach a high value. The large number of these movements may potentially cause fatigue, injury, or health issues in heart surgeons. Using a micro-monitor with data transfer option can eliminate the need for neck extension during heart surgery.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.