Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Apr 23, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 28, 2026 - Jun 23, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Context-Specific Navigation Requirements for Assistive Technologies for People With Visual Impairments: Mixed-Methods Study Using Task-Based Walking Interviews
ABSTRACT
Background:
Navigation remains a major challenge for people with visual impairment (PVI) as many assistive technologies (AT) fail due to limited contextual relevance and insufficient involvement of end-users during development. Traditional AT evaluation tools often miss the real-time, situational needs experienced during dynamic, everyday tasks.
Objective:
This study evaluated a mixed-methods framework combining task-based walking interviews with environmental scene metrics to capture real-time, context-dependent navigation needs of PVI. Findings were used to inform the design of our indoor navigation prototype, Edge A-Eye.
Methods:
Thirteen adults with visual impairments completed eight sequential indoor navigation tasks during a simulated optometry visit. Participants wore Pupil Labs Neon glasses while performing tasks and provided immediate verbal feedback after completing each task. Luminance, contrast, edge density and spatial entropy were extracted from video recordings to objectively characterize the scene. Multiple-choice responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlations, while open-ended responses underwent thematic analysis.
Results:
Navigation needs varied substantially by context. Participants preferred early notifications (6–8 m) for entrance doors, but on-command cues for stairs, elevators, and exits. Across tasks, users consistently requested concise, actionable information such as door type, handrail position, or chair location rather than continuous descriptive narration. While human assistance remained preferred in complex areas, many participants expressed willingness to use AI-based guidance if reliability could be ensured. Descriptive comparisons across tasks indicated that higher environmental luminance and stronger object contrast were observed in scenarios where participants with low vision demonstrated higher navigation success.
Conclusions:
Task-based walking interviews combined with scene analysis provide ecologically valid insights into navigation behavior and user preferences. This methodology supports the development of adaptive, personalized assistive technologies and offers a scalable framework for future AT evaluation.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.