Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Apr 23, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 28, 2026 - Jun 23, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Context-Specific Navigation Requirements for Assistive Technologies for People With Visual Impairments: Mixed-Methods Study Using Task-Based Walking Interviews

  • Prajjol Raj Puri; 
  • Deborah Annan; 
  • Sergio Mejia Romero; 
  • Soutongnoma Safiata Kabore; 
  • Nathalie Gingras-Royer; 
  • Kim Khoa Nguyen; 
  • Joseph Paul Nemargut

ABSTRACT

Background:

Navigation remains a major challenge for people with visual impairment (PVI) as many assistive technologies (AT) fail due to limited contextual relevance and insufficient involvement of end-users during development. Traditional AT evaluation tools often miss the real-time, situational needs experienced during dynamic, everyday tasks.

Objective:

This study evaluated a mixed-methods framework combining task-based walking interviews with environmental scene metrics to capture real-time, context-dependent navigation needs of PVI. Findings were used to inform the design of our indoor navigation prototype, Edge A-Eye.

Methods:

Thirteen adults with visual impairments completed eight sequential indoor navigation tasks during a simulated optometry visit. Participants wore Pupil Labs Neon glasses while performing tasks and provided immediate verbal feedback after completing each task. Luminance, contrast, edge density and spatial entropy were extracted from video recordings to objectively characterize the scene. Multiple-choice responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlations, while open-ended responses underwent thematic analysis.

Results:

Navigation needs varied substantially by context. Participants preferred early notifications (6–8 m) for entrance doors, but on-command cues for stairs, elevators, and exits. Across tasks, users consistently requested concise, actionable information such as door type, handrail position, or chair location rather than continuous descriptive narration. While human assistance remained preferred in complex areas, many participants expressed willingness to use AI-based guidance if reliability could be ensured. Descriptive comparisons across tasks indicated that higher environmental luminance and stronger object contrast were observed in scenarios where participants with low vision demonstrated higher navigation success.

Conclusions:

Task-based walking interviews combined with scene analysis provide ecologically valid insights into navigation behavior and user preferences. This methodology supports the development of adaptive, personalized assistive technologies and offers a scalable framework for future AT evaluation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Puri PR, Annan D, Romero SM, Kabore SS, Gingras-Royer N, Nguyen KK, Nemargut JP

Context-Specific Navigation Requirements for Assistive Technologies for People With Visual Impairments: Mixed-Methods Study Using Task-Based Walking Interviews

JMIR Preprints. 23/04/2026:99266

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.99266

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/99266

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.