Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Apr 16, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 21, 2026 - Jun 16, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The impact of post-discharge medical aftercare on developmental outcomes in preterm infants and parent-child interactions: a systematic review

  • Carla Mehring; 
  • Marie Babel; 
  • Nina Gawehn; 
  • Heidrun Janka; 
  • Maria-Inti Metzendorf; 
  • Antonia Schedewi; 
  • Judith Wohlleben; 
  • Stephanie Weibel; 
  • Juliane Spiegler

ABSTRACT

Background:

Preterm infants (<37 weeks gestational age) remain at increased risk of developmental challenges, potentially influenced by parent-child interactions and parental competencies.

Objective:

To systematically evaluate the evidence on post-discharge nursing or midwifery care or sociomedical aftercare and their effects on developmental outcomes in preterm infants and parent-child interactions compared with preterm infants receiving standard of care.

Methods:

Five databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of intervention (NRSIs) from inception until December 11, 2024. Studies including preterm infants (<37 weeks gestational age) receiving post-discharge medical aftercare were eligible. Children born full-term (≥37 weeks gestational age) and early intervention programmes with a therapeutic approach were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted data from studies that examined following predefined outcomes: participation, quality of life, rehospitalisation, behaviour, and parent-child interaction. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2 for RCTs and ROBINS-I for NRSIs. Clinically and methodologically comparable studies were combined in random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results:

Sixteen studies investigating 3,047 preterm children (gestational age 24-37 weeks) aged three months to five years were included. Data on rehospitalisation, regulatory disorders, risk of maltreatment, parent-child enrichment and attachment were reported with very low to low certainty evidence. Medical aftercare may slightly improve the parent-child enrichment, while effects on other outcomes remain uncertain. No studies reported data on participation, quality of life nor emotional or conduct problems.

Conclusions:

Findings reveal a substantial evidence gap and underline the need for further research, particularly focusing on midwifery care and sociomedical aftercare. (Funding: DLR No. MEDLL1_2022-025.) Clinical Trial: PROSPERO: CRD420251023174


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mehring C, Babel M, Gawehn N, Janka H, Metzendorf MI, Schedewi A, Wohlleben J, Weibel S, Spiegler J

The impact of post-discharge medical aftercare on developmental outcomes in preterm infants and parent-child interactions: a systematic review

JMIR Preprints. 16/04/2026:98332

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.98332

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/98332

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.