Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cardio

Date Submitted: Jan 30, 2018
Date Accepted: Oct 10, 2018

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Outsourcing the Remote Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Medical Care Quality Improvement Project

Giannola G, Torcivia R, Airò Farulla R, Cipolla T

Outsourcing the Remote Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Medical Care Quality Improvement Project

JMIR Cardio 2019;3(2):e9815

DOI: 10.2196/cardio.9815

PMID: 31845898

PMCID: 6938593

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Outsourcing the Remote Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Medical Care Quality Improvement Project

  • Gabriele Giannola; 
  • Riccardo Torcivia; 
  • Riccardo Airò Farulla; 
  • Tommaso Cipolla

Background:

Remote management is partially replacing routine follow-up in patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Although it reduces clinical staff time compared with standard in-office follow-up, a new definition of roles and responsibilities may be needed to review remote transmissions in an effective, efficient, and timely manner. Whether remote triage may be outsourced to an external remote monitoring center (ERMC) is still unclear.

Objective:

The aim of this health care quality improvement project was to evaluate the feasibility of outsourcing remote triage to an ERMC to improve patient care and health care resource utilization.

Methods:

Patients (N=153) with implanted CIEDs were followed up for 8 months. An ERMC composed of nurses and physicians reviewed remote transmissions daily following a specific remote monitoring (RM) protocol. A 6-month benchmarking phase where patients’ transmissions were managed directly by hospital staff was evaluated as a term of comparison.

Results:

A total of 654 transmissions were recorded in the RM system and managed by the ERMC team within 2 working days, showing a significant time reduction compared with standard RM management (100% vs 11%, respectively, within 2 days; P<.001). A total of 84.3% (551/654) of the transmissions did not include a prioritized event and did not require escalation to the hospital clinician. High priority was assigned to 2.3% (15/654) of transmissions, which were communicated to the hospital team by email within 1 working day. Nonurgent device status events occurred in 88 cases and were communicated to the hospital within 2 working days. Of these, 11% (10/88) were followed by a hospitalization.

Conclusions:

The outsourcing of RM management to an ERMC safely provides efficacy and efficiency gains in patients’ care compared with a standard in-hospital management. Moreover, the externalization of RM management could be a key tool for saving dedicated staff and facility time with possible positive economic impact.

ClinicalTrial:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01007474; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01007474


 Citation

Please cite as:

Giannola G, Torcivia R, Airò Farulla R, Cipolla T

Outsourcing the Remote Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Medical Care Quality Improvement Project

JMIR Cardio 2019;3(2):e9815

DOI: 10.2196/cardio.9815

PMID: 31845898

PMCID: 6938593

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.