Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 9, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 9, 2026 - Jun 4, 2026
Date Accepted: Aug 24, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Trust in Digital Sexual Health Information Among Chinese College Students: Qualitative Study

Shi Y, Zhu Y, Sun P, Ye Y, Nie Q, Hasimu M, Wang Q, Gu C

Trust in Digital Sexual Health Information Among Chinese College Students: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e97644

DOI: 10.2196/97644

PMID: 42743548

Trust in Digital Sexual Health Information Among Chinese College Students: A Qualitative Study

  • Ya Shi; 
  • Ying Zhu; 
  • Peiyu Sun; 
  • Ying Ye; 
  • Qingqing Nie; 
  • Maiwuludai Hasimu; 
  • Qingyao Wang; 
  • Can Gu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital platforms are primary sources of sexual health information for young adults, yet they are widely perceived as unreliable. This tension between distrust and reliance remains undertheorized.

Objective:

To examine how Chinese college students use online sources for sexual health information under conditions of uncertainty, and to explore how they navigate the tension between distrust and reliance.

Methods:

We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 22 Chinese undergraduate students (aged 18–25) recruited from eight universities across China using a purposive sampling strategy with maximum variation, complemented by snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted in January 2026. Telephone interviews explored participants' experiences with online sexual health information seeking, including their perceptions of reliability, encounters with contradictory content, credibility evaluation strategies, management of uncertainty, the tension between distrust and continued reliance, and the role of cultural factors in shaping information-seeking behaviours. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results:

Participants reported frequent reliance on online sexual health information despite widespread concerns about its reliability. Four interconnected themes were identified: (1) a fragmented and unreliable information landscape characterized by abundant but superficial, contradictory, and difficult-to-apply content; (2) incomplete trust yet continued reliance, driven by precautionary risk logic and limited offline alternatives; (3) strategies for constructing confidence through cross-platform verification, experiential validation, and platform-specific evaluation; and (4) hidden costs of navigation, including confusion, information overload, and search abandonment.

Conclusions:

Based on these findings, we propose functional trust as an interpretive conceptualisation describing how users act on information with sufficient confidence despite persistent uncertainty—as an interpretive lens for understanding how users navigate digital health information. Our findings suggest that the use of online sexual health information does not depend on trust in the conventional sense, but may involve the construction of functional trust under conditions of persistent uncertainty. Addressing challenges in digital sexual health communication requires not only improving information quality but also enhancing its usability and reducing the cognitive burden of navigation within structurally constrained environments. Clinical Trial: Not applicable.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shi Y, Zhu Y, Sun P, Ye Y, Nie Q, Hasimu M, Wang Q, Gu C

Trust in Digital Sexual Health Information Among Chinese College Students: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e97644

DOI: 10.2196/97644

PMID: 42743548

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.