Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Apr 8, 2026
Date Accepted: Aug 12, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Role-Differentiated AI Competencies and Curriculum Implications for Health Professions Education: Qualitative Study

Park Y, Han Y, Kim H, Ahn S, Kron FW, Lee J

Role-Differentiated AI Competencies and Curriculum Implications for Health Professions Education: Qualitative Study

JMIR Med Educ 2026;12:e97608

DOI: 10.2196/97608

PMID: 42710030

Role-Differentiated AI Competencies and Curriculum Implications for Health Professions Education: A Qualitative Study

  • Yuyi Park; 
  • Yejin Han; 
  • Hyeongjo Kim; 
  • Solmoe Ahn; 
  • Frederick William Kron; 
  • Jihyun Lee

ABSTRACT

Background:

As artificial intelligence (AI) fundamentally transforms the healthcare landscape, medical education curricula have struggled to keep pace with these technological shifts. While current research has established a foundation for general AI literacy, there remains a critical gap in defining the role-specific competencies required for the diverse functions that healthcare professionals perform in an AI-integrated environment.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore how AI-driven changes in healthcare shape competency requirements across professional roles and to develop a differentiated competency and curriculum framework for 3 distinct roles: Users, Developers, and Leaders.

Methods:

Using a qualitative research design, we conducted in-depth interviews with 13 subject matter experts, including medical educators, clinicians, and AI industry specialists. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis with both deductive and inductive coding. To ensure the accuracy and rigor of the interpretation, investigator triangulation and member checking were employed.

Results:

We identified a cumulative competency framework where foundational knowledge vertically extends into advanced specialized roles: (1) Users require machine learning and data literacy, the ability to selectively apply AI solutions, and a high degree of AI-related professionalism to maintain clinical accountability; (2) Developers must build upon these foundations to master algorithm evaluation, regulatory compliance, and cross-disciplinary communication to translate clinical needs into technical refinements; and (3) Leaders require macro-level strategic planning, systemic governance, and resource management competencies to design the policy frameworks and infrastructures necessary for sustainable AI integration. This framework translates these competencies into a structured curriculum roadmap across the medical education continuum.

Conclusions:

This study provides a practical and theoretical foundation for the systematic restructuring of healthcare education. By transitioning from generic AI literacy to a role-based approach, the proposed framework ensures that the future healthcare workforce is equipped not only to utilize AI responsibly but also to govern and lead the next generation of digital health innovation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Park Y, Han Y, Kim H, Ahn S, Kron FW, Lee J

Role-Differentiated AI Competencies and Curriculum Implications for Health Professions Education: Qualitative Study

JMIR Med Educ 2026;12:e97608

DOI: 10.2196/97608

PMID: 42710030

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.