Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 27, 2017
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 27, 2017 - Jan 4, 2018
Date Accepted: Jan 30, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Expert Coaching in Weight Loss: Retrospective Analysis

Painter SL, Ahmed R, Kushner RF, Hill JO, Lindquist R, Brunning S, Margulies A

Expert Coaching in Weight Loss: Retrospective Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2018;20(3):e92

DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9738

PMID: 29535082

PMCID: 5871741

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Expert Coaching in Weight Loss: Retrospective Analysis

  • Stefanie Lynn Painter; 
  • Rezwan Ahmed; 
  • Robert F Kushner; 
  • James O Hill; 
  • Richard Lindquist; 
  • Scott Brunning; 
  • Amy Margulies

Background:

Providing coaches as part of a weight management program is a common practice to increase participant engagement and weight loss success. Understanding coach and participant interactions and how these interactions impact weight loss success needs to be further explored for coaching best practices.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to analyze the coach and participant interaction in a 6-month weight loss intervention administered by Retrofit, a personalized weight management and Web-based disease prevention solution. The study specifically examined the association between different methods of coach-participant interaction and weight loss and tried to understand the level of coaching impact on weight loss outcome.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was performed using 1432 participants enrolled from 2011 to 2016 in the Retrofit weight loss program. Participants were males and females aged 18 years or older with a baseline body mass index of ≥25 kg/m², who also provided at least one weight measurement beyond baseline. First, a detailed analysis of different coach-participant interaction was performed using both intent-to-treat and completer populations. Next, a multiple regression analysis was performed using all measures associated with coach-participant interactions involving expert coaching sessions, live weekly expert-led Web-based classes, and electronic messaging and feedback. Finally, 3 significant predictors (P<.001) were analyzed in depth to reveal the impact on weight loss outcome.

Results:

Participants in the Retrofit weight loss program lost a mean 5.14% (SE 0.14) of their baseline weight, with 44% (SE 0.01) of participants losing at least 5% of their baseline weight. Multiple regression model (R2=.158, P<.001) identified the following top 3 measures as significant predictors of weight loss at 6 months: expert coaching session attendance (P<.001), live weekly Web-based class attendance (P<.001), and food log feedback days per week (P<.001). Attending 80% of expert coaching sessions, attending 60% of live weekly Web-based classes, and receiving a minimum of 1 food log feedback day per week were associated with clinically significant weight loss.

Conclusions:

Participant’s one-on-one expert coaching session attendance, live weekly expert-led interactive Web-based class attendance, and the number of food log feedback days per week from expert coach were significant predictors of weight loss in a 6-month intervention.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Painter SL, Ahmed R, Kushner RF, Hill JO, Lindquist R, Brunning S, Margulies A

Expert Coaching in Weight Loss: Retrospective Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2018;20(3):e92

DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9738

PMID: 29535082

PMCID: 5871741

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.