Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Dec 23, 2017
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 25, 2017 - Aug 21, 2018
Date Accepted: Aug 21, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Experience of Emergency Department Patients With Using the Talking Pole Device: Prospective Interventional Descriptive Study

Yoo J, Soh JY, Lee WH, Chang DK, Lee SU, Cha WC

Experience of Emergency Department Patients With Using the Talking Pole Device: Prospective Interventional Descriptive Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6(11):e191

DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.9676

PMID: 30467105

PMCID: 6284145

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Experience of Emergency Department Patients With Using the Talking Pole Device: Prospective Interventional Descriptive Study

  • Junsang Yoo; 
  • Ji Yeong Soh; 
  • Wan Hyoung Lee; 
  • Dong Kyung Chang; 
  • Se Uk Lee; 
  • Won Chul Cha

Background:

Patient engagement is important. However, it can be difficult in emergency departments (EDs).

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction of ED patients using a patient-friendly health information technology (HIT) device, the “Talking Pole,” and to assess the factors relevant to their satisfaction.

Methods:

This study was conducted in May 2017 at the ED of a tertiary hospital. The “Talking Pole” is a smartphone-based device attached to a intravenous infusion pole with sensors. It is capable of sensing patient movement and fluid dynamics. In addition, it provides clinical information from electronic medical records to patients and serves as a wireless communication tool between patients and nurses. Patients and caregivers who entered the observation room of the ED were selected for the study. The “Talking Pole” devices were provided to all participants, regardless of their need for an intravenous pole upon admittance to the ED. After 2 hours, each participant was given an 18-item questionnaire created for this research, measured on a 5-point Likert scale, regarding their satisfaction with “Talking Pole.”

Results:

Among 52 participants recruited, 54% (28/52) were patients and the remaining were caregivers. In total, 38% (20/52) were male participants; the average age was 54.6 (SD 12.9) years, and 63% (33/52) of the participants were oncology patients and their caregivers. The overall satisfaction rate was 4.17 (SD 0.79 ) points. Spearman correlation coefficient showed a strong association of “overall satisfaction” with “comparison to the previous visit” (ρ=.73 ), “perceived benefit” (ρ=.73), “information satisfaction” (ρ=.70), and “efficiency” (ρ=.70).

Conclusions:

In this study, we introduced a patient-friendly HIT device, the “Talking Pole.” Its architecture focused on enhancing information delivery, which is regarded as a bottleneck toward achieving patient engagement in EDs. Patient and caregiver satisfaction with the “Talking Pole” was positive in the ED environment. In particular, correlation coefficient results improved our understanding about patients’ satisfaction, HIT devices, and services used in the ED.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yoo J, Soh JY, Lee WH, Chang DK, Lee SU, Cha WC

Experience of Emergency Department Patients With Using the Talking Pole Device: Prospective Interventional Descriptive Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6(11):e191

DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.9676

PMID: 30467105

PMCID: 6284145

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.