Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Mar 31, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 17, 2026 - Jun 12, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Training Needs in the Use of Rehabilitation Technologies Among UK Health and Care Professionals: Scoping Review

  • Farhan Alanazi; 
  • Shemah Alsulami; 
  • Vasileios Georgopoulos; 
  • Victoria Abbott-Fleming; 
  • Holly Blake

ABSTRACT

Background:

Rehabilitation technologies are increasingly positioned as key enablers of accessible, scalable rehabilitation in the United Kingdom (UK), particularly in the context of population ageing and rising long‑term conditions. However, adoption in practice is often constrained by insufficient training for health and care professionals (HCPs). A systematic understanding of training needs is essential to support safe, effective, and sustainable implementation, yet no review has synthesized these needs across the breadth of rehabilitation technologies within the UK.

Objective:

This scoping review aimed to identify and map the training and education needs of UK HCPs related to rehabilitation technologies and to analyze these needs using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behavior (COM‑B) model to inform the design of future training interventions.

Methods:

Following JBI methodology and PRISMA‑ScR guidelines, nine databases were searched from inception to November 2025. Data were extracted using a modified JBI tool and synthesized descriptively. Training needs were coded to the TDF and mapped to COM‑B. Methodological quality was appraised using JBI critical appraisal tools.

Results:

Sixteen studies (2012–2025) involving 1,032 HCPs met the inclusion criteria. Technologies were grouped into remote rehabilitation, device‑based, and immersive modalities, most commonly applied in neurorehabilitation. Training provision was limited and inconsistent. Identified needs predominantly aligned with psychological and physical capability domains, including knowledge of safety and evidence, remote assessment and intervention skills, device operation, and patient coaching. Fewer needs related to reflective motivation. Contextual factors influencing training uptake included protected time, access to resources, and flexible delivery formats.

Conclusions:

Training for rehabilitation technologies in the UK remains limited and disproportionately focused on capability‑related needs. Addressing motivational and contextual determinants may enhance adoption and integration into routine practice. These findings informed the development of the RehabTech‑PPC approach, offering a structured, theory‑informed framework to guide the design of future training programs in rehabilitation and assistive technologies. Clinical Trial: The review was registered with Open Science Framework on 31 October 2025: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/47UFM


 Citation

Please cite as:

Alanazi F, Alsulami S, Georgopoulos V, Abbott-Fleming V, Blake H

Training Needs in the Use of Rehabilitation Technologies Among UK Health and Care Professionals: Scoping Review

JMIR Preprints. 31/03/2026:96709

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.96709

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/96709

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.