Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Infodemiology
Date Submitted: Mar 30, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 30, 2026 - May 25, 2026
Date Accepted: Jul 9, 2026
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jul 10, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Multi-layered Epistemic Disruption in AI-Driven Health Misinformation: Conceptual Framework and Viewpoint
ABSTRACT
The role of artificial intelligence in health misinformation is predominantly framed in the literature as a dual-role threat-opportunity dichotomy. This paper argues that this framing is insufficient and proposes a more comprehensive analytical model specific to health information ecosystems: the Multi-layered Epistemic Disruption Framework (MEDF). The framework contends that the danger of AI lies not in generating false information per se, but in its capacity to embed false information simultaneously across four interconnected layers of human trust systems. Although these layers are conceptually distinct, in practice they are intertwined and produce a cumulative effect: (1) the discursive layer — clinical language shielding; (2) the biometric layer — embodied authority transfer; (3) the temporal layer — the synthetic chorus effect; (4) the systemic layer — structural epistemic erosion. This paper is presented as a perspective/framework piece; while the model has not been empirically tested, testable hypotheses are developed for each layer and research priorities are identified.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.