Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Mar 29, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 30, 2026 - May 25, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care for Older Adults in Long-Term Care Facilities: An Umbrella Review

  • Xuehua Zhu; 
  • Xuan Hu; 
  • Mengxia Shi

ABSTRACT

Background:

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in long-term care (LTC) has been driven by workforce challenges and the potential to enhance resident-centered care and improve care quality and safety. However, the evidence on AI in LTC remains fragmented across various intervention types and outcome domains.

Objective:

This umbrella review aims to synthesize evidence from systematic reviews regarding the use of AI in nursing care for older adults in LTC facilities, focusing on care quality, safety, nursing workflow, decision support, implementation barriers, and ethical concerns.

Methods:

The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251244061). A comprehensive search of Chinese and international databases was conducted up to February 2026. Eligible studies were systematic reviews (with or without meta-analysis) that focused on AI interventions in LTC for adults aged 60 years or older. AMSTAR 2 was used for methodological quality assessment.

Results:

Six systematic reviews published between 2019 and 2025 were included. AI applications in LTC nursing were categorized into five areas: social and companion robots, environmental sensors, wearable devices, fall detection, and robot-assisted medication management. The reviews most frequently reported positive outcomes in psychosocial health, particularly in reducing depression, loneliness, and improving social engagement. AI was also associated with benefits in fall surveillance, medication-related care, and nursing workflow. Common barriers included technical limitations, false alarms, privacy concerns, and workflow disruption. AMSTAR 2 quality assessment indicated that 3 reviews were of low quality, and 3 were critically low.

Conclusions:

AI holds promise as an adjunct to resident-centered care in LTC, rather than replacing direct nursing care. It can improve care quality and safety, optimize nursing workflows, and support decision-making. Further studies with rigorous designs and a focus on implementation are needed to strengthen the evidence base and address the identified challenges. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO CRD420251244061; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251244061.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhu X, Hu X, Shi M

Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care for Older Adults in Long-Term Care Facilities: An Umbrella Review

JMIR Preprints. 29/03/2026:96479

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.96479

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/96479

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.