Currently submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: Mar 29, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 1, 2026 - May 27, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Wearable Heart Rate Variability-Derived Passive Biomarkers for Cancer Symptom Screening in Hospitalized Patients: Prospective Observational Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) affects 60–90% of cancer patients yet remains underreported. Heart rate variability (HRV) via wearable devices offers passive symptom monitoring. Prior work showed strong LF/HF–fatigue correlation (ρ = 0.86) in lung cancer, but generalizability to multi-cancer populations is unknown.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate whether three complementary wearable HRV-derived metrics—night LF/HF mean (autonomic level), LF/HF SD (autonomic instability), and the sleep-phase disorder ratio (episodic dysregulation)—can screen for multiple cancer symptoms in hospitalized patients with mixed cancer types.
Methods:
Forty-six hospitalized cancer patients (lung 28%, colorectal 22%, breast 13%, other 37%) wore PPG-based smart wristbands continuously while completing the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Three HRV-derived metrics were examined: night LF/HF mean (autonomic level), LF/HF standard deviation (SD; autonomic instability), and the sleep-phase LF/HF disorder ratio (DR; episodic dysregulation).
Results:
The disorder ratio yielded nearly double the significant correlations of conventional HRV (28.6% vs. 15.1%). For breathlessness ≥ 4, night LF/HF achieved AUC = 0.868 (100% sensitivity). In combined models controlling for mean LF/HF, LF/HF SD was the only metric to independently predict BFI Total (P=.048) and ESAS Fatigue (P=.049). Night LF/HF and DR predicted somatic symptoms; LF/HF SD uniquely predicted fatigue.
Conclusions:
The complementary three-metric framework—level, instability, and episodic dysregulation—captures distinct symptom pathways and extends the LF/HF–fatigue relationship to heterogeneous cancer populations. Clinical Trial: N/A
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.