Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Mar 27, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 27, 2026 - May 22, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Nurse-Led Antimicrobial Stewardship in Hospital and Primary Care Settings: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Brenda Poku; 
  • Suthan Pandarakutty; 
  • Shanthi Ramasubramaniam; 
  • Mansour Mansour; 
  • Sylivia Nalubega; 
  • Manju Varghese; 
  • Lakshmi Renganathan; 
  • Vijith Chandu; 
  • Vishnu Renjith

ABSTRACT

Background:

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a growing and serious threat to patient safety worldwide. Nurses, as the largest professional group in the global health workforce, play a central role in antimicrobial management. However, their contributions to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes remain poorly characterised and inconsistently measured. To date, no systematic review has combined a meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of nurse-led or nurse-involved AMS interventions with an implementation-focused synthesis to inform policy, practice, or future research. This gap is particularly relevant for the Gulf Cooperation Council and the Middle East and North Africa (GCC/MENA) healthcare systems, where the burden of AMR is high, and evidence of nursing contributions to AMS is limited.

Objective:

This protocol describes a convergent, parallel-streams mixed-methods systematic review to determine: (1) the effectiveness of nurse-led or nurse-involved antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions on patient and antimicrobial outcomes in hospital and primary care settings globally; (2) the barriers and facilitators to implementing nurse-led AMS interventions or programmes; and (3) synthesis GCC/MENA evidence via sub-group analysis

Methods:

This protocol describes a convergent, parallel-streams mixed-methods systematic review to determine: (1) the effectiveness of nurse-led or nurse-involved antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions on patient and antimicrobial outcomes in hospital and primary care settings globally; (2) the barriers and facilitators to implementing nurse-led AMS interventions or programmes; and (3) synthesis GCC/MENA evidence via sub-group analysis

Results:

The protocol was registered with PROSPERO. Database searches are scheduled to commence in April 2026. Full-text screening is expected to be completed by June 2026, with data extraction and synthesis anticipated by October 2026. The completed systematic review to be submitted for publication in January 2027.

Conclusions:

This review will provide the first meta-analytic synthesis of the clinical effectiveness of nurse-led AMS, alongside a structured implementation analysis using CFIR 2.0. The findings will inform antimicrobial stewardship programme design, nursing education, and health policy, with particular relevance for GCC/MENA healthcare systems. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO: CRD420261341653; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=1341653


 Citation

Please cite as:

Poku B, Pandarakutty S, Ramasubramaniam S, Mansour M, Nalubega S, Varghese M, Renganathan L, Chandu V, Renjith V

Nurse-Led Antimicrobial Stewardship in Hospital and Primary Care Settings: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Preprints. 27/03/2026:96342

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.96342

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/96342

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.