Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Mar 26, 2026
Date Accepted: Aug 26, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Barriers and Facilitators to Technology Use Among Caregivers of Homebound Older Adults: Descriptive Qualitative Study

Katigbak C, Shenoy E, Ramaswamy P, Lee J, Milbury K, Scott K

Barriers and Facilitators to Technology Use Among Caregivers of Homebound Older Adults: Descriptive Qualitative Study

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e96226

DOI: 10.2196/96226

PMID: 42993582

In Tandem: Barriers and facilitators to caregivers’ use of technology in caring for homebound older adults 

  • Carina Katigbak; 
  • Esha Shenoy; 
  • Padmavathy Ramaswamy; 
  • Jessica Lee; 
  • Kathrin Milbury; 
  • Katie Scott

ABSTRACT

Background:

Homebound older adults (≥ 60 years) and their informal family caregivers face multiple challenges to meeting their instrumental, emotional, and informational needs which results in lower functional status, multiple co-morbidities and poorer mental health. Caregivers are tasked with providing uncompensated care for medically complex older adults often without formal healthcare training. This circumstance may translate to high levels of burden and greater vulnerability to social isolation and loneliness which may precipitate chronic stress and compromise caregiver health. In recent years, numerous health-focused technologies assisting with health promoting behaviors such as physical activity, stress management, and nutritional tracking have emerged. However, little is known about how these tools are adopted by family caregivers of homebound older adults.

Objective:

This descriptive qualitative study sought to explore how caregivers of homebound older adults perceive technology in the context of supporting caregiving and aging in place using focus groups and one-on-one interviews.

Methods:

We conducted a descriptive qualitative study using in-person and online video conference focus group methodology with 40 individuals (consisting of 32 caregivers, 6 clinicians, and 2 additional key informants) to explore perspectives on caregivers’ use of technology use to support their caregiving activities. Participants completed a brief sociodemographic questionnaire prior to all interviews. Procedures for thematic analysis were used to analyze the data and identify emerging themes.

Results:

Three main themes (and related sub-themes) emerged from the data - (1) These technologies aren’t designed for people like us, (2) Balancing the scales, and (3) Preserving a sense of self. Caregivers’ experiences with technology are marked by a paradox: the same technologies that can ease caregiving activities may also impose new burdens through additional costs, uncertainty, learning demands, and emotional strain.

Conclusions:

Caregivers should not navigate these technological tensions alone. Realizing the promise of technology requires more than innovative tools – it demands caregiver-centered design, accessible and equitable implementation strategies, and sustained clinical and health system support to ensure that technology alleviates, rather than amplifies, caregiver burden.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Katigbak C, Shenoy E, Ramaswamy P, Lee J, Milbury K, Scott K

Barriers and Facilitators to Technology Use Among Caregivers of Homebound Older Adults: Descriptive Qualitative Study

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e96226

DOI: 10.2196/96226

PMID: 42993582

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.