Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Education (no longer under consideration since Jun 16, 2026)

Date Submitted: Mar 25, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 26, 2026 - May 21, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Lecturer-in-the-Loop Clinical Dialectic (LLCD): A Framework for AI-Mediated Socratic Simulation in Resource-Limited Settings

  • Oluwayomi Olugbuyi; 
  • Katherine Innis

ABSTRACT

Traditional clinical simulation requires substantial infrastructure investment, limiting accessibility in resource-constrained settings. AI technologies hold promise for scalable simulation yet concerns about clinical accuracy and faculty displacement remain. We describe the “Lecturer-in-the-Loop” Clinical Dialectic (LLCD), a framework integrating AI-mediated Socratic simulation with faculty oversight and share our initial experience with final-year medical students at an academic hospital in Jamaica. We facilitated a teaching session with seven final-year medical students using Claude Opus (Anthropic). Students engaged with two sequential AI-generated pediatric cases: acute asthma exacerbation, then bronchiolitis. These clinical scenarios evolved dynamically based on student decisions. Through dialogue with the system, students asked questions, consolidated pathophysiology, proposed management plans, and requested clarification and elaboration on recommendations. Notably, students independently applied pharmacological reasoning from the asthma case to determine that bronchodilators were inappropriate for bronchiolitis, an unprompted transfer of mechanistic understanding across cases. Faculty provided continuous oversight: prompting students to articulate their clinical reasoning before committing to answers, reinforcing key learning points, and validating AI-generated content in real-time. When the AI generated equivocal or clinically inaccurate content, faculty insight transformed these moments into teaching opportunities about critical appraisal. The session ran approximately 3 hours with sustained student engagement. LLCD may represent a reproducible, low-cost approach to clinical simulation-based education that preserves the central role of faculty while leveraging AI’s dialogic capabilities. By positioning AI as a dialogic tool requiring expert validation rather than an autonomous teacher, the framework addresses safety concerns while enabling scalable simulation in resource-limited settings where high-fidelity simulation infrastructure remains inaccessible.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Olugbuyi O, Innis K

Lecturer-in-the-Loop Clinical Dialectic (LLCD): A Framework for AI-Mediated Socratic Simulation in Resource-Limited Settings

JMIR Preprints. 25/03/2026:96105

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.96105

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/96105

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.