Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Nursing (no longer under consideration since Apr 08, 2026)

Date Submitted: Mar 24, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 8, 2026 - Apr 8, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Effectiveness of motivational interviews for alleviating pre- and postoperative anxiety and postoperative pain among patients undergoing surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

  • Celia Villalba-Aguilar; 
  • José Alberto Laredo-Aguilera; 
  • Lucía Villalba-Aguilar; 
  • Laura Pilar De Paz-Montón; 
  • Víctor Serrano-Fernández; 
  • Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres

ABSTRACT

Background:

Anxiety can influence the intensity of postoperative pain, anesthesia and the need for analgesia. Likewise, proper anxiety management can reduce hospital stays. Therefore, it is important to review the actions of nursing professionals and estimate the effect size of nursing interventions to reduce anxiety in the pre- and postsurgical processes.

Objective:

the objective of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of preoperative motivational interviews by nursing to reduce pre- and postoperative anxiety and postoperative pain after surgery.

Methods:

A systematic review was carried out according to the PRISMA guide, with a record in PROSPERO using DeCS and Boolean operators OR and AND to increase the specificity of the search. In the EBSCOST, Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases, 184 studies were obtained. Patients ≥18 years of age with scheduled surgeries, communication skills, clinical trials or quasi experimental studies were included. The risk of bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the studies. A random effects meta-analysis was performed to analyze pre- and post-operative anxiety and post-operative pain.

Results:

A total of 6 studies were included (4 clinical trials and 2 quasi experimental studies). All studies analyzed preoperative anxiety, which was significantly lower (OR = -1.53; 95% CI: - 4.01 to -0.95; I² = 40%). There was also a decrease in postoperative pain (OR = -0.74; 95% CI: - 0.94 to -0.54; I² = 35%) and postoperative anxiety (OR = -0.48; 95% CI: - 0.78 to -0.19; I² = 0%).

Conclusions:

Motivational interviews by nurses effectively offered clear information and allowed patients to express doubts, reducing their fear of anesthesia, pain and the recovery process. Emotional control improved adaptation to the surgical environment, reducing postoperative pain. With respect to implications for clinical practice, it is necessary to use the same scales to measure anxiety to better compare the studies.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Villalba-Aguilar C, Laredo-Aguilera JA, Villalba-Aguilar L, De Paz-Montón LP, Serrano-Fernández V, Carmona-Torres JM

Effectiveness of motivational interviews for alleviating pre- and postoperative anxiety and postoperative pain among patients undergoing surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

JMIR Preprints. 24/03/2026:96027

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.96027

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/96027

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.