Currently submitted to: Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Date Submitted: Mar 23, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 1, 2026 - May 27, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
An Umbrella Review of the Impact of Virtual Reality Interventions on Multidimensional Health Outcomes
ABSTRACT
Background:
Virtual reality (VR) interventions have been increasingly applied in health care, but their multifaceted impacts on physical, mental, and social health outcomes remain unclear. Existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported inconsistent findings, highlighting the need for an umbrella review to synthesize the highest level of evidence.
Objective:
This study employed an umbrella review approach to systematically integrate current evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the impact of virtual reality (VR) interventions on multidimensional health outcomes. It aims to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness, strength of evidence, and limitations of VR interventions across different populations and outcomes, thereby providing a basis for clinical practice and future research.
Methods:
Strictly adhering to PRISMA-P guidelines, systematic searches were conducted in databases such as Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from their inception to August 2025. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the impact of VR interventions on human health outcomes were included. Two researchers independently performed literature screening and data extraction, while the AMSTAR2 2 and GRADE tools were used to assess methodological quality and evidence quality, respectively.
Results:
Multiple meta-analyses were integrated. The findings revealed that the effects of VR interventions exhibited significant "population-outcome" specificity. VR interventions demonstrated positive effects in improving upper limb function in stroke patients, motor abilities in children with cerebral palsy, aerobic capacity in patients with cardiovascular diseases, exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as cognitive function, musculoskeletal function, balance, and pain (e.g., knee osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia) across various populations (SMD/MD were statistically significant). Additionally, VR interventions enhanced the quality of life in some populations. However, VR did not show significant associations with improvements in activities of daily living in dementia patients, long-term (3-6 months) pain and functional improvements in patients with chronic low back pain, or certain balance functions in frail older adults. The evidence exhibited high heterogeneity, and the GRADE quality of evidence for most outcomes was rated as "low" or "very low."
Conclusions:
VR interventions hold broad application prospects in the health field, but their effects are not universal and must adhere to the principle of "precision adaptation." The current evidence system is limited by factors such as high heterogeneity and uneven methodological quality. Future research should focus on standardizing intervention protocols, validating long-term effects, and exploring underlying mechanisms to enhance evidence quality and promote scientific clinical translation.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.