Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Mar 19, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 24, 2026 - May 19, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Intention Relevant to Zero-Time Exercise Among Chinese Sedentary Workers: Sequential Mediating Roles of Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Physical Activity Triggers

  • Ziyan Xiong; 
  • Xiang Yuan Li; 
  • Lu Chai; 
  • Xiongqiang Duan; 
  • Xiang Hu; 
  • Yuan Xie; 
  • Li Cong

ABSTRACT

Background:

Prolonged sedentary behavior has become a pervasive occupational health concern in China. Zero-Time Exercise (ZTEx), which embeds brief movements into routine tasks, offers a promising low-threshold strategy to reduce inactivity. However, the psychological mechanisms underlying ZTEx adoption remain unclear, which may limit empirical guidance for the development of theory-informed and targeted workplace interventions among sedentary occupational groups.

Objective:

To examine the psychological mechanisms underlying intention to adopt ZTEx among Chinese sedentary workers, and to test a theory-informed sequential mediation model in which exercise motivation influences ZTEx-related intention through self-efficacy and physical activity triggers.

Methods:

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 790 adults in sedentary occupations across 20 Chinese provinces. Validated instruments measured exercise motivation, self-efficacy, physical activity triggers and ZTEx-related intention. Sequential mediation analyses (PROCESS Models 4 and 6) examined direct, indirect, and chain effects of motivation on intention via self-efficacy and triggers, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates.

Results:

Exercise motivation showed significant positive associations with self-efficacy, triggers, and ZTEx intention (all p < 0.001). Three mediation paths were identified: (1) via self-efficacy (B = 0.104, 95% CI [0.057, 0.155]); (2) via triggers (B = 0.157, 95% CI [0.110, 0.205]); and (3) a sequential effect through self-efficacy and triggers (B = 0.025, 95% CI [0.013, 0.039]). A direct effect remained significant (B = 0.167, 95% CI [0.088, 0.246]). The full model explained 28.5% of the variance in ZTEx-related intention.

Conclusions:

Guided by the COM-B framework and the Fogg Behavior Model, this study delineates a structured pathway linking exercise motivation, self-efficacy, and physical activity triggers in shaping ZTEx-related intention among adults in sedentary occupations. These findings indicate that interventions integrating motivational enhancement, efficacy support, and context-sensitive prompts may support the incorporation of low-threshold physical activity into routine sedentary work contexts.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Xiong Z, Li XY, Chai L, Duan X, Hu X, Xie Y, Cong L

Intention Relevant to Zero-Time Exercise Among Chinese Sedentary Workers: Sequential Mediating Roles of Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Physical Activity Triggers

JMIR Preprints. 19/03/2026:95707

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.95707

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/95707

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.