Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Mar 19, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 6, 2026 - Jun 1, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction in Pediatric Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study with a Socially Assistive Robot

  • Janika Leoste; 
  • Slavko Rakić; 
  • Kristel Marmor; 
  • Kadi Lubi; 
  • Liina-Harjus Soostar; 
  • Andres Käver; 
  • Katrin Aasma; 
  • Katie Beatty; 
  • Leo Benjamin Leoste

ABSTRACT

Background:

Socially assistive robots are increasingly being explored in health care, but evidence from real pediatric outpatient settings remains limited. In particular, little is known about how contextual support, human facilitation, and organizational conditions shape everyday human-robot interaction and practical acceptance in hospital environments

Objective:

This study aimed to examine how visitor engagement with a social robot differed across 3 implementation conditions in a pediatric outpatient hospital, how engagement differed between children and adults, and which socio-technical factors staff identified as enabling or constraining implementation.

Methods:

This convergent mixed methods pilot study was conducted at Tallinn Children’s Hospital. The quantitative strand consisted of structured behavioral observation across 3 field conditions, baseline, poster support, and staff facilitation, in which 675 visitors were recorded. The qualitative strand consisted of 4 small staff-group interviews with 12 health care professionals focused on use opportunities, barriers, and implementation needs. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with deductive and inductive coding.

Results:

Observable engagement increased across the 3 conditions, from 3.1% in the baseline phase to 22.6% with poster support and 38.1% with staff facilitation. Children engaged more often than adults across all phases. Staff reported that acceptance depended less on novelty alone than on role clarity, visible usefulness, multilingual guidance, workflow fit, troubleshooting support, and clear organizational ownership. The robot was perceived as most useful for wayfinding, reducing uncertainty, engaging children during waiting, and supporting a calmer outpatient atmosphere.

Conclusions:

The findings support a socio-technical view of robot acceptance in pediatric health care. Meaningful uptake emerged through the interaction of robot affordances, local mediation, and organizational embedding rather than through technology alone. Public-facing, narrowly scoped functions, such as wayfinding, waiting-time support, parent guidance, and simple procedural information, appear to be the most feasible early use cases for social robots in pediatric hospitals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Leoste J, Rakić S, Marmor K, Lubi K, Soostar LH, Käver A, Aasma K, Beatty K, Leoste LB

Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction in Pediatric Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study with a Socially Assistive Robot

JMIR Preprints. 19/03/2026:95702

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.95702

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/95702

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.