Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 17, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 17, 2026 - May 12, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Integrating Wearable-enabled mHealth Reports into Recovery High School Care Planning: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study

  • Luca A. Leschly; 
  • Shane S. George; 
  • Nicole M. Pyke; 
  • Emily Alden Hennessy

ABSTRACT

Background:

Recovery High Schools (RHS) integrate academics and therapeutic support for youth with substance use disorders, yet staff often have limited visibility into students’ day-to-day health behaviors between check-ins. Wearable technology can generate objective indicators (e.g., activity, sleep) that may support individualized recovery care planning, but RHSs have not yet implemented these tools.

Objective:

This pilot study evaluated the feasibility, engagement, acceptability, and perceived impact of integrating wearable-derived health reports into care planning at one RHS in the Northeast United States. Secondary aims explored changes in psychosocial outcomes (school belonging, social identity, recovery capital, and social-emotional learning).

Methods:

Thirteen adolescents (Mages 15-21) and school staff (n = 3) participated in a single-site, mixed methods 3-month pilot. Data included baseline and monthly surveys, Fitbit wear-time and activity data collected via Fitabase, weekly staff surveys, and staff interviews. Outcomes were summarized descriptively, and qualitative feedback was synthesized to characterize workflow integration and implementation barriers to care.

Results:

Survey retention declined from 100% to 46.2% at Month 3; 2 students left the school during the study. Wearable engagement was inconsistent, with 69.2% (n = 9) participants wearing the device at least once, declining to 23.1%-30.8% (n = 3-4) by Weeks 9-12. Staff adopted weekly device report usage at a high rate (88.2% of survey weeks) and described them as helpful for care planning and opening dialogue with students regarding sleep, activity, and substance use. Key implementation challenges included inconsistent student device wear and logistical barriers on assessment days.

Conclusions:

Wearable-derived health reports were acceptable to RHS staff and feasibly integrated into care planning workflows, though sustained student device engagement was a critical barrier. Future implementation studies should prioritize structures including device-use protocols, enhance syncing tech support, and strategies to sustain adolescent engagement across the full study period. Clinical Trial: https://osf.io/q6jt4/overview?view_only=eb1606b3bfa44e658383a63ab734fde1


 Citation

Please cite as:

Leschly LA, George SS, Pyke NM, Hennessy EA

Integrating Wearable-enabled mHealth Reports into Recovery High School Care Planning: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study

JMIR Preprints. 17/03/2026:95575

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.95575

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/95575

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.