Currently submitted to: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Date Submitted: Mar 17, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 19, 2026 - May 14, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Focus on Understanding Stress, Resilience, and Adaptability (FocUS-R): a mixed-methods platform for repeated surveillance of stress and stress management effectiveness
ABSTRACT
Background:
Trials of stress management interventions have shown modest and inconsistent effects. Emerging evidence suggests that structural constraints may limit the real-world effectiveness of behavioural strategies, yet this process has rarely been examined empirically. Population-level tools for monitoring stress and stress-management processes over time remain limited.
Objective:
To develop and pilot a mixed-methods surveillance platform for repeated measurement of stress and stress-management effectiveness in real-world contexts, and to assess its feasibility, validity, and ability to detect equity-relevant patterns.
Methods:
Adults living in Australia completed baseline assessments including sociodemographics, perceived stress (PSS-10), psychological flexibility (MPFI), social resources, and health measures. Participants then completed brief fortnightly surveillance surveys for up to 12 months comprising 0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings of stress and perceived stress management effectiveness, a stress-related symptom checklist, and open-ended reporting of stressors and coping strategies. We assessed feasibility, convergent validity of early VAS indicators, and preliminary equity patterning.
Results:
Seventy-seven participants completed baseline measures, and 1,195 fortnightly check-ins were recorded as of June 2025. Early VAS stress demonstrated strong convergent validity with baseline perceived stress and stress symptoms. Despite pilot recruitment skewing toward higher socioeconomic status, clear gradients were observed in both stress and stress management. Lower-income participants reported higher stress, lower perceived stress management, and fewer good stress-management check-ins. Psychological flexibility was positively associated with stress management overall, but showed weaker associations among lower-income participants.
Conclusions:
Brief, repeated stress surveillance is feasible and can generate equity-informative signals. Findings support a model in which adaptive skills are widely available but their effective expression is shaped by structural conditions. The FocUS-R platform provides a scalable approach for monitoring population stress processes and identifying contexts where structural constraints may limit the effectiveness of behavioural strategies.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.