Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Mar 9, 2026
Date Accepted: Jul 15, 2026
Quantifying the Intensity of Online Social Support via LLM-based Evidence Extraction: Development and Validation Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Online social support, interaction among individuals that one helps another within a difficult situation through online platforms such as online forums or social media. Despite the growing usage and importance of online social support, prior studies have mainly focused on only either the characteristics of support-seekers or identifying supporting types, and there are a few rooms to improve the prior research in terms of two perspectives. First, intensity of support, which indicates the strength of the willingness represented in the given support message, has been little explored. In addition, the models proposed in previous research have relied on hand-crafted features or simple text embeddings of the whole support message generated, which are difficult to support explainability for the decision by the prediction model.
Objective:
This study proposes a deep learning model that determines the intensity of online social support, particularly for informational and emotional support provided in online communities. While prior studies mainly concentrated on the identification task for support types, this research quantifies the strength of support, which may better explain how strongly supporters indicate their informational and emotional support.
Methods:
The proposed model categorizes informational and emotional support into three levels—strong, moderate, and weak. It collaborates with a large language model (LLM) to extract key sentences or phrases expressing supportive intent and to compute sentiment scores from both the original post and the reply. All the computed features are fed into the neural network layers for the final prediction. The proposed model was evaluated on a manually annotated dataset consisting of post–comment pairs.
Results:
The model achieves superior accuracy compared to baselines (0.713 for informational and 0.700 for emotional support). Throughout the analysis of case examples, we demonstrate that the extracted textual evidence provides interpretability: explicit empathy or detailed advice corresponds to strong support, while vague or indirect comments correspond to weak support.
Conclusions:
Cooperating with Large Language Models (LLMs), quantifying the intensity of online social support is highly achievable. In addition, LLMs can provide the great explainability for the decision made by the model.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.