Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Mar 9, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 10, 2026 - May 5, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Comparing Surgical Outcomes of Sodium Hyaluronate Versus Hypromellose as Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Topical Phacoemulsification Among Diabetic Patients with Cataract: A Prospective Comparative Interventional Cohort Study Protocol

  • Varnil Savsani; 
  • Archana Thool

ABSTRACT

Background:

: Diabetic patients undergoing cataract surgery face heightened risks due to compromised corneal endothelium, impaired healing, and poor pupillary dilatation. The choice of ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) during phacoemulsification may significantly affect surgical outcomes in this vulnerable population; however, comparative evidence remains limited.

Objective:

This study aims to compare surgical outcomes of sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution (Hyloject) versus hypromellose ophthalmic solution USP (Hyprosol) as OVDs in topical phacoemulsification among diabetic patients with cataract at a tertiary care centre in central India.

Methods:

This is a prospective comparative non-randomised interventional study to be conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. A total of 174 diabetic patients (87 per group) aged above 40 years with senile cataract undergoing phacoemulsification will be enrolled using alternate sequential allocation. The primary outcome is change in corneal endothelial cell density assessed by specular microscopy; secondary outcomes include visual acuity recovery, intraocular pressure changes, and postoperative complications, all assessed preoperatively and at day 1, day 15, and 1 month postoperatively.

Results:

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University) on July 9, 2025 (Ref. No. DMIHER(DU)/IEC/2025/370), with a subsequent amendment approved on February 21, 2026 (Ref. No. DMIHER(DU)/IEC/2026/018). The study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India on October 15, 2025 (CTRI/2025/10/096085). Enrollment commenced in November 2025; as of March 5, 2026, 35 participants have been enrolled, with 13 allocated to Group 1 (sodium hyaluronate) and 12 to Group 2 (hypromellose); the remaining participants are awaiting surgery and postoperative follow-up. Data collection is projected to be completed by August 2027, with final results expected to be submitted for publication by October 2027.

Conclusions:

This study is expected to provide comparative evidence on the safety and efficacy of two commonly used OVDs in diabetic cataract surgery, informing evidence-based selection of viscoelastic agents to optimise outcomes in this high-risk population. Identifying the optimal OVD for endothelial protection in diabetic eyes may carry significant clinical relevance in regions such as India, where the dual burden of diabetes and cataract is substantial and cataract surgery volumes are high. Clinical Trial: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI): CTRI/2025/10/096085. Registered October 15, 2025.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Savsani V, Thool A

Comparing Surgical Outcomes of Sodium Hyaluronate Versus Hypromellose as Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Topical Phacoemulsification Among Diabetic Patients with Cataract: A Prospective Comparative Interventional Cohort Study Protocol

JMIR Preprints. 09/03/2026:94956

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.94956

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/94956

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.