Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Mar 7, 2026
Date Accepted: Jul 9, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Effects of Outreach Initiatives on Equitable Access to Dermatology Services: Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

University of Utah Health's Dermatology Outreach , Albrecht JM, Lyon JD, Birdsall M, Broadbent E, Ufkes N, Zone S, Bowen A, Hull C, Madigan L, Snyder AM, Wu C, Lewis BK

The Effects of Outreach Initiatives on Equitable Access to Dermatology Services: Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

JMIR Dermatol 2026;9:e94872

DOI: 10.2196/94872

PMID: 42727101

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Reducing Disparities in Access to Dermatology Services: A Review of One Academic Institution’s Comprehensive Outreach Efforts

  • University of Utah Health's Dermatology Outreach; 
  • J Mark Albrecht; 
  • Justin David Lyon; 
  • Michael Birdsall; 
  • Eliza Broadbent; 
  • Nicole Ufkes; 
  • Stephanie Zone; 
  • Anneli Bowen; 
  • Christopher Hull; 
  • Lauren Madigan; 
  • Ashley M. Snyder; 
  • Chaorong Wu; 
  • Bethany K. Lewis

ABSTRACT

Background:

Maldistribution of providers, variable insurance coverage, and underrepresentation within dermatology all affect patient access to dermatology services. Few studies have evaluated institutional models for addressing these pervasive gaps.

Objective:

To evaluate one academic institution’s efforts to comprehensively expand access to dermatology services.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was performed using data from the University of Utah Health (UUH) Dermatology’s outreach clinics compared with general dermatology ambulatory (GDA) clinics in Salt Lake City over three years. Descriptive statistics were reported for patient demographics, insurance, and diagnosis. Statistical methods assessed differences between clinic types. Outreach clinics were categorized by delivery method: rural “fly-in” clinics, live video teledermatology (rural and incarcerated), free clinics in urban areas, and asynchronous eConsults (store-and-forward teledermatology).

Results:

Outreach clinics served 2,283 distinct patients (3,471 encounters). The general dermatology clinics at the University of Utah yielded 207,493 patients (1,141,280 encounters). Outreach clinics overall served a more diverse, younger, and Medicaid-insured patient population than general ambulatory clinics, with a higher prevalence of inflammatory/autoimmune conditions. eConsult and free clinic encounters more commonly served patients under 65 years of age, and eConsult encounters, specifically, served a more racially/ethnically diverse patient population as compared to UUH GDA clinic encounters.

Conclusions:

This study confirms that UUH Dermatology’s efforts to enhance healthcare access are effectively reaching targeted underserved patient populations. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

University of Utah Health's Dermatology Outreach , Albrecht JM, Lyon JD, Birdsall M, Broadbent E, Ufkes N, Zone S, Bowen A, Hull C, Madigan L, Snyder AM, Wu C, Lewis BK

The Effects of Outreach Initiatives on Equitable Access to Dermatology Services: Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

JMIR Dermatol 2026;9:e94872

DOI: 10.2196/94872

PMID: 42727101

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.